Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29269933›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Nanopore DNA Sequencing and Genome Assembly on the International Space Station.

Sarah L Castro-Wallace, Charles Y Chiu, Kristen K John, Sarah E Stahl, Kathleen H Rubins, Alexa B R McIntyre, Jason P Dworkin, Mark L Lupisella, David J Smith, Douglas J Botkin and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Leptospirosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Microbial Ecotoxicology-40 Years on.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sarah L Castro-WallaceBiomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Charles Y ChiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2915-2094
Kristen K JohnNASA Postdoctoral Program, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Sarah E StahlJES Tech, Houston, TX, United States.
Kathleen H RubinsAstronaut Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Alexa B R McIntyreDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jason P DworkinSolar System Exploration Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-8997
Mark L LupisellaExploration Systems Projects Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States.
David J SmithSpace Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States.
Douglas J BotkinFormerly JES Tech, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-6474
Timothy A StephensonApplied Engineering and Technology Directorate, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, United States.
Sissel JuulOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0315-4449
Daniel J TurnerOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.
Fernando IzquierdoOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.
Scot FedermanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Doug StrykeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sneha SomasekarDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Noah AlexanderDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Guixia YuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Christopher E MasonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1850-1642
Aaron S BurtonAstromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States. aaron.burton@nasa.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-1194-4336

Funding

Pan-Genomic Approaches for Comprehensive Blood Screening of Novel or Emerging Infectious AgentsR01HL105704 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHIU, CHARLES YEN · 2011 to 2020
$5.9M
Study of Neural Tube Defects Etiology: Genome and ExposomeR01ES021006 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI FINNELL, RICHARD H., MASON, CHRISTOPHER EDWARD · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
Community Research Education and Engagement for Data Science (CREEDS)R25EB020393 · NIBIB · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CLAUDIO, LUZ, KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2017
$578k
Real-Time Unbiased Pathogen Detection in Febrile Illnesses by Nanopore SequencingR21AI120977 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHIU, CHARLES YEN · 2016 to 2017
$436k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105704NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI120977NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB020393NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the MinION DNA sequencer in-flight on the International Space Station (ISS), and benchmarked its performance off-Earth against the MinION, Illumina MiSeq, and PacBio RS II sequencing platforms in terrestrial laboratories. Samples contained equimolar mixtures of genomic DNA from lambda bacteriophage, Escherichia coli (strain K12, MG1655) and Mus musculus (female BALB/c mouse). Nine sequencing runs were performed aboard the ISS over a 6-month period, yielding a total of 276,882 reads with no apparent decrease in performance over time. From sequence data collected aboard the ISS, we constructed directed assemblies of the ~4.6 Mb E. coli genome, ~48.5 kb lambda genome, and a representative M. musculus sequence (the ~16.3 kb mitochondrial genome), at 100%, 100%, and 96.7% consensus pairwise identity, respectively; de novo assembly of the E. coli genome from raw reads yielded a single contig comprising 99.9% of the genome at 98.6% consensus pairwise identity. Simulated real-time analyses of in-flight sequence data using an automated bioinformatic pipeline and laptop-based genomic assembly demonstrated the feasibility of sequencing analysis and microbial identification aboard the ISS. These findings illustrate the potential for sequencing applications including disease diagnosis, environmental monitoring, and elucidating the molecular basis for how organisms respond to spaceflight.

Indexed as

GenomeNanoporesSpace FlightAnimalsEscherichia coliFemaleGenome, BacterialMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29269933
PMCPMC5740133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.