ArticleScientific reports2017
Preliminary study of confounding factors of elastography and the application of fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules with indeterminate elastography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate confounding factors of real-time ultrasound elastography (RTE) and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US)-guided FNA for thyroid nodules with indeterminate elastography compared with conventional US. This study included 244 nodules with indeterminate elastography caused by several confounding factors (large or small size, deep location, isthmic or paratracheal location, calcification, thyroiditis, conflicting results between conventional US and RTE), and corresponding prevalences of malignancy were calculated. Additionally, conventional US and US-FNA data were collected and compared. The prevalences of malignancy of confounding factors were 74.1%, 75.0%, 73.3%, 46.2%, 27.3%, and 53.2%, respectively. Sonographic features (border, margin, echogenicity, echohomogeneity, and microcalcification) were significantly different between benign and malignant thyroid nodules (p < 0.05), and most of them exhibited good sensitivity but unsatisfactory specificity and accuracy. While US-FNA exhibited better performance with a sensitivity of 96.9%, a specificity of 99.1% and an accuracy of 98.0% in the diagnosis of malignancy. Given that indeterminate RTE is inevitable with a rather high malignant risk due to several confounding factors, our study revealed that US-FNA was a valuable tool in nodules with indeterminate elastography by increasing the detection rate of thyroid malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.