Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29269734›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Inferring evolutionary responses of Anolis carolinensis introduced into the Ogasawara archipelago using whole genome sequence data.

Satoshi Tamate, Watal M Iwasaki, Kenneth L Krysko, Brian J Camposano, Hideaki Mori, Ryo Funayama, Keiko Nakayama, Takashi Makino, Masakado Kawata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Satoshi TamateDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan.
Watal M IwasakiDepartment of Evolutionary Studies of Biosystems, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4718-7605
Kenneth L KryskoDivision of Herpetology, Florida Museum of Natural History, 1659 Museum Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Brian J CamposanoForest Management Bureau, Florida Forest Service, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 3125 Conner Boulevard, I-255, Tallahassee, FL, 32399, USA.
Hideaki MoriJapan Wildlife Research Center, Ogasawara Division, Okumura, Chichijima, Ogasawara, Tokyo, 100-2101, Japan.
Ryo FunayamaUnited Center for Advanced Research and Translational Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
Keiko NakayamaUnited Center for Advanced Research and Translational Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
Takashi MakinoDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan. tamakino@m.tohoku.ac.jp.
Masakado KawataDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8578, Japan. kawata@m.tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-5438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invaded species often can rapidly expand and establish in novel environments through adaptive evolution, resulting in devastating effects on native communities. However, it is unclear if genetic variation at whole-genomic levels is actually reduced in the introduced populations and which genetic changes have occurred responding to adaptation to new environments. In the 1960s, Anolis carolinensis was introduced onto one of the Ogasawara Islands, Japan, and subsequently expanded its range rapidly throughout two of the islands. Morphological comparison showed that lower hindlimb length in the introduced populations tended to be longer than those in its native Florida populations. Using re-sequenced whole genomic data, we estimated that the effective population size at the time of introduction was actually small (less than 50). We also inferred putative genomic regions subject to natural selection after this introduction event using SweeD and a method based on Tajima's D, π and F

Indexed as

EcosystemSelection, GeneticAnimalsIntroduced SpeciesIslandsLizardsWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29269734
PMCPMC5740155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.