ArticleBMJ case reports2017
Management of atypical femoral fracture in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Genetics of Atypical Femur Fractures-a Systematic Review.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Pooled it
- Medical Management of Patients After Atypical Femur Fractures: a Systematic Review and Recommendations From the European Calcified Tissue Society.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Guideline
- Occult Hypervascularity of an Endobronchial Carcinoid Demonstrated by Bronchial Angiography.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Atypical Femoral Fractures in Adult Patients with Classical Osteogenesis Imperfecta.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Atypical femur fracture in a woman with osteogenesis imperfecta and multiple myeloma.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a generalised connective tissue disorder associated with low bone mass, bone fragility and increased susceptibility to fractures. First-line treatment to improve bone mineral density (BMD) is usually with bisphosphonates but long-term usage has been associated with uncommon complications such as atypical femoral fractures (AFF). Treatment with teriparatide in this situation has been reported with positive outcomes. However, choice of treatment after 2 years of teriparatide has not been well studied or reported. We describe a patient with OI treated with bisphosphonates for 9 years, who then suffered a spontaneous AFF, was subsequently started on teriparatide for 2 years followed by 6 monthly Denosumab. 1 year post-treatment with Denosumab, there was significant improvement in BMD, good fracture healing and no new fractures. This case highlights the potential use of denosumab following 2 years of teriparatide treatment in patients with OI with AFF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.