ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Online Medical Consultation Service-Oriented Recommendations: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Stage-Based Model of User Engagement Patterns in an Online Health Community for Cardiovascular Disease Management: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Predictors of Professional Responses in Nonprofit Mental Health Forums: Interpretable Machine Learning Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Spillover Effects of Paid Functions on Physicians' Unpaid Knowledge Activities: Quasi-Experimental Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Impact of Reverse Empowerment and Proactive Motivations on Physicians' Online Knowledge Sharing in Digital Platforms: Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The Relationship Between Static Characteristics of Physicians and Patient Consultation Volume in Internet Hospitals: Quantitative Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Doctors' Personal Preference and Adoption of Mobile Apps to Communicate with Patients in China: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Who is Facing Higher Increased Demand After the Online-Offline Channel Integration? Evidence from Public Hospitals in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Understanding Physicians' Motivation to Provide Healthcare Service Online in the Digital Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Doctors' Preferences in the Selection of Patients in Online Medical Consultations: An Empirical Study with Doctor-Patient Consultation Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Research Based on Online Medical Platform: The Influence of Strong and Weak Ties Information on Patients' Consultation Behavior.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Exploring the Peer Effect of Physicians' and Patients' Participation Behavior: Evidence from Online Health Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Can online health information sources really improve patient satisfaction?Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A Comparison Study of Doctor-Patient Internet Interactions in Traditional and Modern Medicine: Empirical Evidence from Online Healthcare Communities.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.PloS one · 2022Article
- Extracting Additional Influences From Physician Profiles With Topic Modeling: Impact on Ratings and Page Views in Online Healthcare Communities.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Understanding the Inequality of Web Traffic and Engagement in Online Healthcare Communities.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Emotion diffusion effect: Negative sentiment COVID-19 tweets of public organizations attract more responses from followers.PloS one · 2022Article
- Consultation Pricing of the Online Health Care Service in China: Hierarchical Linear Regression Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- The Effects of Log-in Behaviors and Web Reviews on Patient Consultation in Online Health Communities: Longitudinal Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe online health care community is not just a place for the public to share physician reviews or medical knowledge, but also a physician-patient communication platform. The medical resources of developing countries are relatively inadequate, and the online health care community is a potential solution to alleviate the phenomenon of long hospital queues and the lack of medical resources in rural areas. However, the success of the online health care community depends on online contributions by physicians.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine the effect of incentive mechanisms on physician's online contribution behavior in the online health community. We addressed the following questions: (1) from which specialty area are physicians more likely to participate in online health care community activities, (2) what are the factors affecting physician online contributions, and (3) do incentive mechanisms, including psychological and material rewards, result in differences of physician online contributions?
methodsWe designed a longitudinal study involving a data sample in three waves. All data were collected from the Good Doctor website, which is the largest online health care community in China. We first used descriptive statistics to investigate the physician online contribution behavior in its entirety. Then multiple linear and quadratic regression models were applied to verify the causal relationship between rewards and physician online contribution.
resultsOur sample included 40,300 physicians from 3607 different hospitals, 10 different major specialty areas, and 31 different provinces or municipalities. Based on the multiple quadratic regression model, we found that the coefficients of the control variables, past physician online contributions, doctor review rating, clinic title, hospital level, and city level, were .415, .189, -.099, -.106, and -.143, respectively. For the psychological (or material) rewards, the standardized coefficient of the main effect was 0.261 (or 0.688) and the standardized coefficient of the quadratic effect was -0.015 (or -0.049). All estimates were statistically significant (P<.001).
conclusionsPhysicians with more past physician online contribution, with higher review ratings, coming from lower level clinics, not coming from tertiary hospitals, and not coming from big cities were more willing to participate in online health care community activities. To promote physician online contribution, it is necessary to establish an appropriate incentive mechanism including psychological and material rewards. Finally, our findings suggest two guidelines for designing a useful incentive mechanism to facilitate physician online contribution. First, material reward is more useful than psychological reward. Second, as indicated by the concave-down-increasing causal relationship between rewards and physician online contribution, although an appropriate reward is effective in encouraging willingness on the part of physicians to contribute to the online health care community, the effect of additional rewards is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.