Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29269335›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2017

Uterine Artery Flow and Offspring Growth in Long-Evans Rats following Maternal Exposure to Ozone during Implantation.

Colette N Miller, Janice A Dye, Allen D Ledbetter, Mette C Schladweiler, Judy H Richards, Samantha J Snow, Charles E Wood, Andres R Henriquez, Leslie C Thompson, Aimen K Farraj and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for assessing maternal cardiovascular physiology during pregnancy and postpartum.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: A review of underlying mechanisms.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prenatal ozone exposure programs a sexually dimorphic susceptibility to high-fat diet in adolescent Long Evans rats.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Nanomaterial Inhalation During Pregnancy Alters Systemic Vascular Function in a Cyclooxygenase-Dependent Manner.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  13. Early Gestational Exposure to Inhaled Ozone Impairs Maternal Uterine Artery and Cardiac Function.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ozone Exposure During Implantation Increases Serum Bioactivity in HTR-8/SVneo Trophoblasts.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Colette N MillerEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Janice A DyeEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Allen D LedbetterEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Mette C SchladweilerEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Judy H RichardsEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Samantha J SnowEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Charles E WoodIntegrated Systems Toxicology Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Andres R HenriquezCurriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Leslie C ThompsonEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Aimen K FarrajEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Mehdi S HazariEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Urmila P KodavantiEnvironmental Public Health Division, National Health & Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
TOXICOLOGYT32ES007126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ILONA JASPERS, Bernard E. Weissman · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological studies suggest that increased ozone exposure during gestation may compromise fetal growth. In particular, the implantation stage of pregnancy is considered a key window of susceptibility for this outcome.

objectivesThe main goals of this study were to investigate the effects of short-term ozone inhalation during implantation on fetal growth outcomes and to explore the potential for alterations in uterine arterial flow as a contributing mechanism.

methodsPregnant Long-Evans rats were exposed to filtered air, 0.4 ppm ozone, or 0.8 ppm ozone for 4 h/d during implantation, on gestation days (GD) 5 and 6. Tail cuff blood pressure and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound were measured on GD 15, 19, and 21. To assess whether peri-implantation ozone exposure resulted in sustained pulmonary or systemic health effects, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, serum metabolic and inflammatory end points, and kidney histopathology were evaluated in dams at GD 21. Growth parameters assessed in GD 21 offspring included fetal weight, length, and body composition.

resultsMeasures of maternal uterine arterial flow, including resistance index and mean velocity, indicated that resistance increased between GD 15 and GD 21 in 0.8 ppm dams but decreased in controls, although absolute values were similar in both groups on GD 21. Ozone-exposed dams also had lower serum glucose and higher free fatty acid concentrations than controls on GD 21. On GD 21, both male and female offspring had lower body weight than controls, and pooled subsets of 3 male and 3 female fetuses from litters exposed to 0.8 ppm ozone had lower lean mass and fat mass than pooled control offspring.

conclusionsFindings from our experimental model suggest that the offspring of dams exposed to ozone during implantation had reduced growth compared with controls, possibly as a consequence of ozone-induced vascular dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2019.

Indexed as

Inhalation ExposureMaternal ExposureAir PollutantsAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmbryo ImplantationFemaleFetal DevelopmentMaleOzoneRandom AllocationRatsRats, Long-EvansRegional Blood FlowUltrasonography, DopplerUterine ArteryAir PollutantsOzone

Identifiers

PMID29269335
PMCPMC5963593
OpenAlexW2781133953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.