ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2018
The feasibility of an encapsulated cell approach in an animal deafness model.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of the Clinical Applicability of Neurotrophins in Cochlear Implantation.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Review
- The Reconstruction of Peripheral Auditory Circuit: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Microtechnologies for inner ear drug delivery.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2020Review
- Stem Cell Based Drug Delivery for Protection of Auditory Neurons in a Guinea Pig Model of Cochlear Implantation.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Long-TermFrontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For patients with profound hearing loss a cochlear implant (CI) is the only treatment today. The function of a CI depends in part of the function and survival of the remaining spiral ganglion neurons (SGN). It is well known from animal models that inner ear infusion of neurotrophic factors prevents SGN degeneration and maintains electrical responsiveness in deafened animals. The purpose with this study was to investigate the effects of a novel encapsulated cell (EC) device releasing neurotrophic factors in the deafened guinea pig. The results showed that an EC device releasing glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) or brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) implanted for four weeks in deafened guinea pigs significantly preserved the SGNs and maintained their electrical responsiveness. There was a significant difference between BDNF and GDNF in favour of GDNF. This study, demonstrating positive structural and functional effects in the deafened inner ear, suggests that an implanted EC device releasing biologically protective substances offers a feasible approach for treating progressive hearing impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.