ReviewBrain and language2018
An interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception.
Review in Brain and language, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Engagement of the speech motor system in challenging speech perception: Activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses.Human brain mapping · 2024Pooled it
- Dynamic acoustic-to-categorical representations of phonemes and prosody along ventral and dorsal speech streams.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Embodied Speech: Sensorimotor Contributions to Native and Non-Native Phoneme Processing and Learning.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Neural representation of sensorimotor features in language-motor areas during auditory and visual perception.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Left motor cortex contributes to auditory phonological discrimination.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Dynamic causal modeling analysis reveals the modulation of motor cortex and integration in superior temporal gyrus during multisensory speech perception.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Specificity of Motor Contributions to Auditory Statistical Learning.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Both stronger and weaker cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity patterns during processing of spoken sentences in autism spectrum disorder.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Bilateral human laryngeal motor cortex in perceptual decision of lexical tone and voicing of consonant.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021Article
- Asymmetry of Auditory-Motor Speech Processing is Determined by Language Experience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Motor engagement relates to accurate perception of phonemes and audiovisual words, but not auditory words.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Effect of Bilateral Opercular Syndrome on Speech Perception.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Learning Speech Production and Perception through Sensorimotor Interactions.Cerebral cortex communications · 2021Article
- Sex Effect on Presurgical Language Mapping in Patients With a Brain Tumor.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- The motor system's [modest] contribution to speech perception.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Article
- Sensitivity of Speech Output to Delayed Auditory Feedback in Primary Progressive Aphasias.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mounting evidence indicates a role in perceptual decoding of speech for the dorsal auditory stream connecting between temporal auditory and frontal-parietal articulatory areas. The activation time course in auditory, somatosensory and motor regions during speech processing is seldom taken into account in models of speech perception. We critically review the literature with a focus on temporal information, and contrast between three alternative models of auditory-motor speech processing: parallel, hierarchical, and interactive. We argue that electrophysiological and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies support the interactive model. The findings reveal that auditory and somatomotor areas are engaged almost simultaneously, before 100 ms. There is also evidence of early interactions between auditory and motor areas. We propose a new interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception in which auditory and articulatory somatomotor areas are connected from early stages of speech processing. We also discuss how attention and other factors can affect the timing and strength of auditory-motor interactions and propose directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.