Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29268731›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Andrew Concoff, Parag Sancheti, Faizan Niazi, Peter Shaw, Jeffrey Rosen

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05414617 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multicenter, Open Study Evaluating the Short-term Safety of Use of Pandora Administered in the Form of 1 Intra-articular Injection of Happyone or 3 Intra-articular Injections of Happysoft in Patients Suffering From Gonarthrosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLabrhaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsIntra-articular single injection, Intra-articular three injections
NCT05978180 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Groups Study Comparing the Safety and the Efficacy of the Administration of One Intra-articular Injection of 4.8 ml (HO-1) or Three Intra-articular Injections of 2.2 ml (HS-3) of Pandora Gel to One Intra-articular Injection of 2.5 ml (SINOVIAL®ONE), in Symptomatic Gonarthrosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorLabrhaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled252ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsMedical Device : HO-1, Medical Device : HS-3, Medical Device : SINOVIAL® ONE
NCT07202390 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intraarticular Gold Microparticles for Knee Osteoarthritis. A Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthern Orthopaedic Division, DenmarkRan2026 to 2029Enrolled240ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArms20 mg metallic gold microparticles (72.000 particles, 20-40 µm) will be injected into the knee joint using 2 mL hyaluronic acid., Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Expert consensus on glucocorticoids injection for knee osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew ConcoffDepartments of Orthopedics and Rheumatology, St. Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California, USA. Andrew.Concoff@stjoe.org.ORCID 0000-0001-8325-760X
Parag SanchetiSancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Maharashtra, India.
Faizan NiaziFerring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Peter ShawFerring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Jeffrey RosenDepartment of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, New York Presbyterian Queens; Department of Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Ferring Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USSancheti Institute For Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation · INSt. Jude Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA) is a common therapy used to treat knee pain and suppress knee inflammation in knee osteoarthritis (OA), typically prescribed in regimens ranging from a single injection to 5 weekly injections given once weekly. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of IA-HA, with subgroup analyses to explore the differences in knee pain and adverse events (AEs) across different dosing regimens.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify studies evaluating IA-HA for the management of knee OA compared to IA-saline. Primary outcome measure was the mean knee pain score at 13 Weeks (3 months) or 26 weeks (6 months). Secondary outcome was the number of treatment-related AEs and treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs). We evaluated differences in levels of pain and AEs/SAEs between dosing regimens compared to IA-Saline.

resultsThirty articles were included. Overall, IA-HA injections were associated with less knee pain compared to IA-Saline injections for all dosing regimens. 2-4 injections of IA-HA vs. IA-Saline produced the largest effect size at both 3-months and 6-months (Standard mean difference [SMD] = -0.76; -0.98 to -0.53, 95% CI, P < 0.00001, and SMD = -0.36; -0.63 to -0.09 95% CI, P = 0.008, respectively). Additionally, single injection studies yielded a non-significant treatment effect at 3 and 6 months, while ≥5 5 injections demonstrated a significant improvement in pain only at 6 months. Five or more injections of IA-HA were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related AEs compared to IA-Saline (Risk ratio [RR] = 1.67; 1.09 to 2.56 95% CI, p = 0.02), which was a result not seen within the 1 and 2-4 injection subgroups.

conclusionOverall, 2-4 and ≥5 injection regimens provided pain relief over IA-Saline, while single injection did not. Intra-articular injections of HA used in a 2-4 injection treatment regimen provided the greatest benefit when compared to IA-Saline with respect to pain improvement in patients with knee OA, and was generally deemed safe with few to no treatment-related AEs reported across studies. Future research is needed to directly compare these treatment regimens.

Indexed as

HumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularOsteoarthritis, KneePain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeViscosupplementsHyaluronic AcidViscosupplementsIntra-articular hyaluronic acid (IA-HA)KneeOsteoarthritis (OA)

Identifiers

PMID29268731
PMCPMC5740709
OpenAlexW2776731902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.