Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29268698›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios confer poor prognoses in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Dan Liu, Yi Huang, Lei Li, Juan Song, Li Zhang, Weimin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predicting response and survival to first-line treatment with baseline [Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan LiuDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Yi HuangClinical Laboratory Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Lei LiDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Juan SongDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhangLaboratory of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China. zhangli7375@scu.edu.cn.
Weimin LiDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China. weimi003@yahoo.com.

Funding

Nature Science Foundation of China 81201851Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2014SZ0126Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2014SZ0148Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2014SZ023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are easily obtained from routine blood tests. We investigated the associations of the NLR and PLR with the clinical parameters and prognoses of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.

methodsPre-treatment clinical and laboratory data from 139 patients with SCLC were retrospectively studied with univariate analyses. The NLR and PLR values were divided into two separate groups: high NLR (>4.55, n = 32) vs low NLR (≤4.55, n = 107) and high PLR (>148, n = 63) vs low PLR (≤148, n = 76). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the effects of NLR and PLR on overall survival.

resultsChi-square analyses revealed significant associations of high NLR with tumour stage, hepatic metastasis, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and significant associations of high PLR with tumour stage, bone and hepatic metastases, exposure to cooking oil fumes, and chemotherapy. Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated an association of high NLR with smoking exposure, and high NLR and high PLR were correlated with several laboratory parameters. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that high NLR and high PLR conferred poor prognoses for SCLC patients. Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that NLR, tumour stage, and hepatic metastasis were independent prognostic factors for survival. In this study, we found that NLR and PLR were associated with several factors that reflect the inflammatory (white blood cell count, WBC; lactate dehydrogenase, LDH) and nutritional (albumin, ALB; haemoglobin, HB; and cholesterol) status of SCLC patients at diagnosis.

conclusionsNLR is an independent prognostic factor and can be used to predict the mortality risk of SCLC patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateBiomarkers, TumorMortality riskNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPlatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioPrognosisSmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID29268698
PMCPMC5740933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.