Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29268696›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2017

Stereoscopic processing of crossed and uncrossed disparities in the human visual cortex.

Yuan Li, Chuncheng Zhang, Chunping Hou, Li Yao, Jiacai Zhang, Zhiying Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ultra-High-Field Neuroimaging Reveals Fine-Scale Processing for 3D Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan LiSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chuncheng ZhangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Chunping HouSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Li YaoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. yaoli@bnu.edu.cn.
Jiacai ZhangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Zhiying LongState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. friskying@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2459-5910
Beijing Normal University · CNTianjin University · CN

Funding

Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 61731003National Natural Science Foundation of China 61210001National Natural Science Foundation of China 61471262National Natural Science Foundation of China 61520106002National Natural Science Foundation of China 61671067the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2017XTCX04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBinocular disparity provides a powerful cue for depth perception in a stereoscopic environment. Despite increasing knowledge of the cortical areas that process disparity from neuroimaging studies, the neural mechanism underlying disparity sign processing [crossed disparity (CD)/uncrossed disparity (UD)] is still poorly understood. In the present study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to explore different neural features that are relevant to disparity-sign processing.

methodsWe performed an fMRI experiment on 27 right-handed healthy human volunteers by using both general linear model (GLM) and multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) methods. First, GLM was used to determine the cortical areas that displayed different responses to different disparity signs. Second, MVPA was used to determine how the cortical areas discriminate different disparity signs.

resultsThe GLM analysis results indicated that shapes with UD induced significantly stronger activity in the sub-region (LO) of the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) than those with CD. The results of MVPA based on region of interest indicated that areas V3d and V3A displayed higher accuracy in the discrimination of crossed and uncrossed disparities than LOC. The results of searchlight-based MVPA indicated that the dorsal visual cortex showed significantly higher prediction accuracy than the ventral visual cortex and the sub-region LO of LOC showed high accuracy in the discrimination of crossed and uncrossed disparities.

conclusionsThe results may suggest the dorsal visual areas are more discriminative to the disparity signs than the ventral visual areas although they are not sensitive to the disparity sign processing. Moreover, the LO in the ventral visual cortex is relevant to the recognition of shapes with different disparity signs and discriminative to the disparity sign.

Indexed as

Brain MappingFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationVision DisparityVisual CortexYoung AdultCrossed disparityfMRIMVPAStereopsisUncrossed disparity

Identifiers

PMID29268696
PMCPMC5740787
OpenAlexW2777294295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.