Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29268387›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017

Physiological rules for the heart, lungs and other pressure-based organs.

Aaron R Casha, Liberato Camilleri, Alexander Manché, Ruben Gatt, Marilyn Gauci, Marie-Therese Camilleri-Podesta, Joseph N Grima, Marco Scarci, Stanley Chetcuti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Aaron R CashaBiomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Liberato CamilleriDepartment of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Alexander ManchéDepartment of Cardiac Services, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Ruben GattMetamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Marilyn GauciDepartment of Anaesthesia, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Marie-Therese Camilleri-PodestaBiomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Joseph N GrimaMetamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Marco ScarciDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Stanley ChetcutiCardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Malta · MTMater Dei Hospital · MTUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adherence of the heart to physical laws, such as Laplace's Law, may act as a measure of the organ's relative efficiency. Allometric relationships were investigated to assess the heart's efficiency concerning end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, cardiac pressurization energy, cardiac output and mass.

methodsData to generate allometric relationships was obtained using a literature search, identifying heart and lung data across different mammalian and bird species. Statistical analysis was carried out using ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation.

resultsNear isometric relationships exist between body mass and seven parameters indicating no "efficiency of size" with scaling of the heart, and size-matching of the heart to the lungs and whole body. Even though there was equal efficiency in pressurization energy generation, cardiac output was maximally efficient in small mammals <10 kg and birds; the human heart reached only 71% efficiency. This loss in cardiac efficiency with increasing body mass can be explained by the aortic cross-section that scales following the three-quarter allometry law, compared to end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes that scale isometrically. The heart is therefore throttled by a relatively small aorta at large body size.

conclusionsMammalian and avian hearts operate at similar efficiencies, demonstrating a high degree of symmorphosis, however cardiac output efficiency decreases in larger animals due to a relatively negative aortic cross-section allometry. This work has a myriad of potential applications including explaining cardiac dysfunction in athletes, patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement and why heavy exercise is associated with a worse prognosis than mild or moderate exercise.

Indexed as

allometrybiomechanicsPhysiologysymmorphosis

Identifiers

PMID29268387
PMCPMC5723864
OpenAlexW2762354450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.