ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018
Surgical case series of multiple aneurysms: A single-centre experience of 16 years.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple aneurysms are present in 10% in patients with intracranial aneurysms. An analysis of the literature, focusing on the different treatments, and a description of our experience are performed. PRESENTATION OF CASE SERIES: A surgical series with multiple intracranial aneurysms from 2000 to 2016, describing demographic, radiological and clinical features, is showed. In all patients a pre- and post-operative angiography was performed and surgical treatment, based on accurate indications, provided good outcomes in most cases. DISCUSSION: Successful treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms can be achieved by an interdisciplinary approach and the main factors influencing surgical treatment are discussed.
conclusionsSurgery always remains a definitive treatment and, considering intrinsic lesional features and patient's characteristics, it offers good results for intracranial multiple aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.