SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017
Respiratory muscle training for multiple sclerosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effects of breathing training on walking ability and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Inspiratory muscle training for chronic critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of respiratory muscle training in adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, trunk control and fatigue in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of a respiratory rehabilitation program including an inspiration training devicePeerJ · 2023Trial
- Effects of a respiratory and neurological rehabilitation treatment plan in post Covid-19 affected university students. Randomized clinical study.Chronic respiratory diseaseTrial
- Respiratory Muscle Performance and Pulmonary Function in Sarcopenic and Non-Sarcopenic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nebulized bone marrow-derived stem cell supernatant induces tolerogenic dendritic cells via upregulation of FOXO3 for EAE treatment.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Article
- The Role of Osteopontin in Respiratory Health and Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Respiratory issues in patients with multiple sclerosis as a risk factor during SARS-CoV-2 infection: a potential role for exercise.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2023Review
- Fatigue, post-exertional malaise and orthostatic intolerance: a map of Cochrane evidence relevant to rehabilitation for people with post COVID-19 condition.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022Article
- Physiotherapy for Multiple Sclerosis Patients From Early to Transition Phase: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2022Article
- Is there a role of pulmonary rehabilitation in extrapulmonary diseases frequently encountered in the practice of physical medicine and rehabilitation?Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Article
- Amelioration of Ambient Particulate Matter (PMFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Exercise and lifestyle physical activity recommendations for people with multiple sclerosis throughout the disease course.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of the central nervous system, affecting approximately 2.5 million people worldwide. People with MS may experience limitations in muscular strength and endurance - including the respiratory muscles, affecting functional performance and exercise capacity. Respiratory muscle weakness can also lead to diminished performance on coughing, which may result in (aspiration) pneumonia or even acute ventilatory failure, complications that frequently cause death in MS. Training of the respiratory muscles might improve respiratory function and cough efficacy.
objectivesTo assess the effects of respiratory muscle training versus any other type of training or no training for respiratory muscle function, pulmonary function and clinical outcomes in people with MS. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Trials Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group (3 February 2017), which contains trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS and the trial registry databases ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two authors independently screened records yielded by the search, handsearched reference lists of review articles and primary studies, checked trial registers for protocols, and contacted experts in the field to identify further published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy of respiratory muscle training versus any control in people with MS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted study characteristics and study data from included RCTs, and two other reviewers independently cross-checked all extracted data. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. When at least two RCTs provided data for the same type of outcome, we performed meta-analyses. We assessed the certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE approach. MAIN
resultsWe included six RCTs, comprising 195 participants with MS. Two RCTs investigated inspiratory muscle training with a threshold device; three RCTs, expiratory muscle training with a threshold device; and one RCT, regular breathing exercises. Eighteen participants (˜ 10%) dropped out; trials reported no serious adverse events.We pooled and analyzed data of 5 trials (N=137) for both inspiratory and expiratory muscle training, using a fixed-effect model for all but one outcome. Compared to no active control, meta-analysis showed that inspiratory muscle training resulted in no significant difference in maximal inspiratory pressure (mean difference (MD) 6.50 cmH AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review provides low-quality evidence that resistive inspiratory muscle training with a resistive threshold device is moderately effective postintervention for improving predicted maximal inspiratory pressure in people with mild to moderate MS, whereas expiratory muscle training showed no significant effects. The sustainability of the favourable effect of inspiratory muscle training is unclear, as is the impact of the observed effects on quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.