Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267981›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Enhanced spontaneous DNA twisting/bending fluctuations unveiled by fluorescence lifetime distributions promote mismatch recognition by the Rad4 nucleotide excision repair complex.

Sagnik Chakraborty, Peter J Steinbach, Debamita Paul, Hong Mu, Suse Broyde, Jung-Hyun Min, Anjum Ansari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Concanavalin A Delivers a Photoactive Protein to the Bacterial Wall.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sagnik ChakrabortyDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Peter J SteinbachCenter for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Debamita PaulDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Hong MuDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Suse BroydeDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Jung-Hyun MinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Anjum AnsariDepartment of Physics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USNew York University · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Simulating Protein Structures, Complexes, And DynamicsZIACT000265 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI STEINBACH, PETER J · 2009 to 2020
$8.2M
DNA Lesion Structures: Mutagenicity and RepairR01CA075449 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BROYDE, SUSE · 1997 to 2015
$4.3M
Environmental DNA Lesions and Mutagenesis: Molecular Mechanisms of Lesion Recognition for Repair and Polymerase BypassR01ES025987 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI BROYDE, SUSE · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075449NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES025987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rad4/XPC recognizes diverse DNA lesions including ultraviolet-photolesions and carcinogen-DNA adducts, initiating nucleotide excision repair. Studies have suggested that Rad4/XPC senses lesion-induced helix-destabilization to flip out nucleotides from damaged DNA sites. However, characterizing how DNA deformability and/or distortions impact recognition has been challenging. Here, using fluorescence lifetime measurements empowered by a maximum entropy algorithm, we mapped the conformational heterogeneities of artificially destabilized mismatched DNA substrates of varying Rad4-binding specificities. The conformational distributions, as probed by FRET between a cytosine-analog pair exquisitely sensitive to DNA twisting/bending, reveal a direct connection between intrinsic DNA deformability and Rad4 recognition. High-specificity CCC/CCC mismatch, free in solution, sampled a strikingly broad range of conformations from B-DNA-like to highly distorted conformations that resembled those observed with Rad4 bound; the extent of these distortions increased with bound Rad4 and with temperature. Conversely, the non-specific TAT/TAT mismatch had a homogeneous, B-DNA-like conformation. Molecular dynamics simulations also revealed a wide distribution of conformations for CCC/CCC, complementing experimental findings. We propose that intrinsic deformability promotes Rad4 damage recognition, perhaps by stalling a diffusing protein and/or facilitating 'conformational capture' of pre-distorted damaged sites. Surprisingly, even mismatched DNA specifically bound to Rad4 remains highly dynamic, a feature that may reflect the versatility of Rad4/XPC to recognize many structurally dissimilar lesions.

Indexed as

DNA RepairBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA, FungalFluorescent DyesGene ExpressionKineticsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProtein BindingProtein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein Conformation, beta-StrandProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalFluorescent DyesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesRAD23 protein, S cerevisiaeRad4 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29267981
PMCPMC5815138
OpenAlexW2779027744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.