Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267859›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2018

Accurate prediction of personalized olfactory perception from large-scale chemoinformatic features.

Hongyang Li, Bharat Panwar, Gilbert S Omenn, Yuanfang Guan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterizing human odorant signals: insights from insect semiochemistry andPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongyang LiDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics and Departments of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Bharat PanwarDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics and Departments of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Gilbert S OmennDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics and Departments of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yuanfang GuanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics and Departments of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The olfactory stimulus-percept problem has been studied for more than a century, yet it is still hard to precisely predict the odor given the large-scale chemoinformatic features of an odorant molecule. A major challenge is that the perceived qualities vary greatly among individuals due to different genetic and cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the combinatorial interactions between multiple odorant receptors and diverse molecules significantly complicate the olfaction prediction. Many attempts have been made to establish structure-odor relationships for intensity and pleasantness, but no models are available to predict the personalized multi-odor attributes of molecules. In this study, we describe our winning algorithm for predicting individual and population perceptual responses to various odorants in the DREAM Olfaction Prediction Challenge. Results: We find that random forest model consisting of multiple decision trees is well suited to this prediction problem, given the large feature spaces and high variability of perceptual ratings among individuals. Integrating both population and individual perceptions into our model effectively reduces the influence of noise and outliers. By analyzing the importance of each chemical feature, we find that a small set of low- and nondegenerative features is sufficient for accurate prediction. Conclusions: Our random forest model successfully predicts personalized odor attributes of structurally diverse molecules. This model together with the top discriminative features has the potential to extend our understanding of olfactory perception mechanisms and provide an alternative for rational odorant design.

Indexed as

Decision TreesComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningMolecular StructureOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionSmellStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID29267859
PMCPMC5824779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.