ArticleGigaScience2018
Accurate prediction of personalized olfactory perception from large-scale chemoinformatic features.
Article in GigaScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- PharmaGNN: a model for odor prediction based on graph neural networks.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- What makes a scent trigger a memory? A cognitive decomposition of odor-evoked retrieval.iScience · 2026Article
- Advances in predicting human olfactory perception: from data acquisition to computational models.RSC advances · 2025Review
- OWSum: algorithmic odor prediction and insight into structure-odor relationships.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- Optimisation and evaluation of the random forest model in the efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer based on radiomics signature from high-resolution T2 weighted images.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
- Evidence of widespread, independent sequence signature for transcription factor cobinding.Genome research · 2021Article
- DeepSleep convolutional neural network allows accurate and fast detection of sleep arousal.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Data based predictive models for odor perception.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Characterizing human odorant signals: insights from insect semiochemistry andPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Artificial intelligence deciphers codes for color and odor perceptions based on large-scale chemoinformatic data.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Machine learning empowers phosphoproteome prediction in cancers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Joint learning improves protein abundance prediction in cancers.BMC biology · 2019Article
- Development of QSAR machine learning-based models to forecast the effect of substances on malignant melanoma cells.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Anchor: trans-cell type prediction of transcription factor binding sites.Genome research · 2019Article
- Machine Learning in Human Olfactory Research.Chemical senses · 2019Review
- Accurate prediction of personalized olfactory perception from large-scale chemoinformatic features.GigaScience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The olfactory stimulus-percept problem has been studied for more than a century, yet it is still hard to precisely predict the odor given the large-scale chemoinformatic features of an odorant molecule. A major challenge is that the perceived qualities vary greatly among individuals due to different genetic and cultural backgrounds. Moreover, the combinatorial interactions between multiple odorant receptors and diverse molecules significantly complicate the olfaction prediction. Many attempts have been made to establish structure-odor relationships for intensity and pleasantness, but no models are available to predict the personalized multi-odor attributes of molecules. In this study, we describe our winning algorithm for predicting individual and population perceptual responses to various odorants in the DREAM Olfaction Prediction Challenge. Results: We find that random forest model consisting of multiple decision trees is well suited to this prediction problem, given the large feature spaces and high variability of perceptual ratings among individuals. Integrating both population and individual perceptions into our model effectively reduces the influence of noise and outliers. By analyzing the importance of each chemical feature, we find that a small set of low- and nondegenerative features is sufficient for accurate prediction. Conclusions: Our random forest model successfully predicts personalized odor attributes of structurally diverse molecules. This model together with the top discriminative features has the potential to extend our understanding of olfactory perception mechanisms and provide an alternative for rational odorant design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.