ArticleAge and ageing2018
Accurate identification of hospital admissions from care homes; development and validation of an automated algorithm.
Article in Age and ageing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in opioid prescribing during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: an interrupted time-series analysis in the OpenSAFELY-TTP cohort.The Lancet. Public health · 2024Article
- Care home resident identification: A comparison of address matching methods with Natural Language Processing.PloS one · 2024Article
- Investigating the association between COVID-19 vaccination and care home outbreak frequency and duration.Public health · 2022Article
- Closing the UK care home data gap - methodological challenges and solutions.International journal of population data science · 2021Article
- Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Do home modifications reduce care home admissions for older people? A matched control evaluation of the Care & Repair Cymru service in Wales.Age and ageing · 2020Article
- Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- A novel method for identifying care home residents in England: a validation study.International journal of population data science · 2020Article
- Effect on secondary care of providing enhanced support to residential and nursing home residents: a subgroup analysis of a retrospective matched cohort study.BMJ quality & safety · 2019Article
- Identifying care-home residents in routine healthcare datasets: a diagnostic test accuracy study of five methods.Age and ageing · 2019Article
- Quality improvement collaborative aiming for Proactive HEAlthcare of Older People in Care Homes (PEACH): a realist evaluation protocol.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Identifying who lives in a care home-a challenge to be conquered.Age and ageing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: measuring the complex needs of care home residents is crucial for resource allocation. Hospital patient administration systems (PAS) may not accurately identify admissions from care homes. Objective: to develop and validate an accurate, practical method of identifying care home resident hospital admission using routinely collected PAS data. Method: admissions data between 2011 and 2012 (n = 103,105) to an acute Trust were modelled to develop an automated tool which compared the hospital PAS address details with the Care Quality Commission's (CQC) database, producing a likelihood of care home residency. This tool and the Nuffield method (CQC postcode match only) were validated against a manual check of a random sample of admissions (n = 2,000). A dataset from a separate Trust was analysed to assess generalisability. Results: the hospital PAS was inaccurate; none of the admissions from a care home identified on manual check had a care home source of admission recorded on the PAS. Both methods performed well; the automated tool had a higher positive predictive value than the Nuffield method (100% 95% confidence interval (CI) 98.23-100% versus 87.10% 95%CI 82.28-91.00%), meaning those coded as care home residents were more likely to actually be from a care home. Our automated tool had a high level of agreement 99.2% with the second Trust's data (Kappa 0.86 P < 0.001). Conclusions: care home status is not routinely or accurately captured. Automated matching offers an accurate, repeatable, scalable method to identify care home residency and could be used as a tool to benchmark how care home residents use acute hospital resources across the National Health Service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.