Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267587›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2017

Characterization of Leptospira isolates from humans and the environment in Uruguay.

Paulina Meny, Clara Menéndez, Jair Quintero, Elba Hernández, Cristina Ríos, Ilana Teruszkin Balassiano, Camilla Nunes Dos Reis Trindade, Juliana Magalhães Vital-Brazil, Tatiane Mendes Varela Ramos, Natalia Ashfield and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Paulina MenyUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Clara MenéndezUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Jair QuinteroUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Elba HernándezUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Cristina RíosUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Ilana Teruszkin BalassianoInstituto Osvaldo Cruz, Centro de Referência Nacional para Leptospirose, WHO Collaborating Center for Leptospirosis, Laboratório de Zoonoses Bacterianas, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Camilla Nunes Dos Reis TrindadeInstituto Osvaldo Cruz, Centro de Referência Nacional para Leptospirose, WHO Collaborating Center for Leptospirosis, Laboratório de Zoonoses Bacterianas, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliana Magalhães Vital-BrazilInstituto Osvaldo Cruz, Centro de Referência Nacional para Leptospirose, WHO Collaborating Center for Leptospirosis, Laboratório de Zoonoses Bacterianas, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tatiane Mendes Varela RamosInstituto Osvaldo Cruz, Centro de Referência Nacional para Leptospirose, WHO Collaborating Center for Leptospirosis, Laboratório de Zoonoses Bacterianas, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Natalia AshfieldUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Camila FebleUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Esthefani AvilaUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Felipe SchelottoUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.
Gustavo VarelaUniversidad de la República, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory diagnosis of human leptospirosis usually relies on indirect methods exploring specific immune response. Isolation and identification of the involved strains are cumbersome, but can provide biological resources for pathogenic studies and relevant information for guiding prevention and control measures. The aim of the research we are hereby reporting was the characterization of Leptospira isolates obtained from humans and the environment in Uruguay. Blood cultures were performed from early samples of 302 Uruguayan patients, mainly rural workers, and from 36 water samples taken from their living or working environments. Eight human isolates and seven environmental isolates were obtained and analyzed by end point Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Multilocus Variable Number of Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA) and other molecular methods. Human isolates corresponded to several serogroups and serovars of Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira kirschneri species, probably reflecting the infection with similar involved Leptospira species and serovars of an extended animal reservoir in rural settings of the country, mostly dedicated to meat and dairy production. Culture-positive patients were older than usually affected workers, and presented signs and symptoms of severe illness. A high organic and circulating bacterial burden may explain an easier positive result from these workers' samples. Environmental isolates were mainly identified as Leptospira biflexa strains, with a single L. meyeri isolate of uncertain significance.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyAdultBloodBlood CultureDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansLeptospiraLeptospirosisMiddle AgedMinisatellite RepeatsMultilocus Sequence TypingPolymerase Chain ReactionReference ValuesRural PopulationSerogroupDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID29267587
PMCPMC5738764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.