Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267583›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2017

Identification and antifungal susceptibility of Candida species isolated from the urine of patients in a university hospital in Brazil.

Gláucia Moreira Espíndola Lima, Maína de Oliveira Nunes, Marilene Rodrigues Chang, Rosianne Assis de Sousa Tsujisaki, Joslaine de Oliveira Nunes, Cleison Ledesma Taira, Danilo Yamamoto Thomaz, Gilda Maria Bárbaro Del Negro, Rinaldo Pôncio Mendes, Anamaria Mello Miranda Paniago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A MALDI-TOF nucleic acid mass spectrometry assay for rapid detection of fiveFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. High prevalence of fluconazole resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gláucia Moreira Espíndola LimaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Hospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Maína de Oliveira NunesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Hospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Marilene Rodrigues ChangUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Alimentos e Nutrição, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Rosianne Assis de Sousa TsujisakiUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Alimentos e Nutrição, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Joslaine de Oliveira NunesUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Alimentos e Nutrição, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Cleison Ledesma TairaUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Laboratório de Micologia Médica (LIM-53), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Danilo Yamamoto ThomazUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Laboratório de Micologia Médica (LIM-53), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gilda Maria Bárbaro Del NegroUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Laboratório de Micologia Médica (LIM-53), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rinaldo Pôncio MendesUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anamaria Mello Miranda PaniagoUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Faculdade de Medicina, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify Candida spp. isolated from candiduria episodes at a tertiary hospital in the Midwest region of Brazil, and to determine their susceptibility profiles to antifungal compounds. From May 2011 to April 2012, Candida spp. isolated from 106 adult patients with candiduria admitted to the University Hospital of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul were evaluated. Both, species identification and susceptibility testing with fluconazole-FLC, voriconazole-VRC, and amphotericin B-AmB were carried out using the Vitek 2. To discriminate species of the C. parapsilosis complex, a RAPD-PCR technique using the RPO2 primer was performed. From the total of 106 isolates, 42 (39.6%) C. albicans and 64 (60.4%) Candida non-albicans (CNA) - 33 C. tropicalis, 18 C. glabrata, 5 C. krusei, 4 C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, 2 C. kefyr, 1 C. lusitaniae, and 1 C. guilliermondii were identified. All isolates were susceptible to AmB and VRC, whereas all C. glabrata isolates presented either resistance (5.6%) or dose-dependent susceptibility (94.4%) to FLC. The study of Candida spp. and their resistance profiles may help in tailoring more efficient therapeutic strategies for candiduria.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsBrazilCandidaCandidiasisDrug Resistance, FungalElectrophoresis, Agar GelFemaleFluconazoleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID29267583
PMCPMC5738760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.