Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267547›Full record

Trial reportRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2017

Comparison of education group strategies and home visits in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trial.

Jéssica Caroline Dos Santos, Daniel Nogueira Cortez, Maísa Mara Lopes Macedo, Edna Afonso Reis, Ilka Afonso Reis, Heloísa Carvalho Torres

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02132338 (Evaluation of the Educational Program of Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02132338 early_phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of the Educational Program of Diabetes Mellitus: Focus on Empowerment

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Minas GeraisRan2014 to 2017Enrolled191ConditionsType 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsThe Education Health Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jéssica Caroline Dos SantosMaster's student, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Scholarship holder at Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil.
Daniel Nogueira CortezPhD, Adjunct Professor, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil.
Maísa Mara Lopes MacedoMSc, RN, Hospital da Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Edna Afonso ReisPhD, Associate Professor, Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ilka Afonso ReisPhD, Adjunct Professor, Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Heloísa Carvalho TorresPhD, Associate Professor, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto compare the adherence and empowerment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for self-care practices and glycemic control in group education strategies and home visits.

methodClinical trial with ten randomized clusters, performed with 238 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus distributed in group education, home visit, and control group. Socio-demographic data, glycated hemoglobin and those obtained from the self-care and empowerment questionnaires were collected. Statistical analysis was performed separately by educational strategy.

resultsthe mean age of the patients was 57.8 years old (SD = 9.4 years old), with a predominantly female participation (66.4%). Both strategies presented similar results regarding adherence to self-care practices and patient empowerment. There was also a reduction in glycated hemoglobin levels; however, only in the education group, the difference presented statistical significance (p <0.001).

conclusionthe strategies were effective; however, group education presented better glycemic control results in relation to the home visit. International registry: NCT02132338 and national: RBR-92j38t in the clinical trials registry.

Indexed as

House CallsPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicPower, PsychologicalSelf CareBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID29267547
PMCPMC5738960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.