Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29267321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Light spectrum modifies the utilization pattern of energy sources in Pseudomonas sp. DR 5-09.

Samareh Gharaie, Lea A I Vaas, Anna Karin Rosberg, Sofia T Windstam, Maria E Karlsson, Karl-Johan Bergstrand, Sammar Khalil, Walter Wohanka, Beatrix W Alsanius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Blue Light InhibitsFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samareh GharaieSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Lea A I VaasFraunhofer IME-ScreeningPort, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna Karin RosbergSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Sofia T WindstamSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Maria E KarlssonSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Karl-Johan BergstrandSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Sammar KhalilSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.
Walter WohankaGeisenheim University, Department of Phytomedicine, Geisenheim, Germany.
Beatrix W AlsaniusSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biosystems and Technology, Microbial Horticulture Unit, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6300-2829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the overruling impact of light in the phyllosphere, little is known regarding the influence of light spectra on non-phototrophic bacteria colonizing the leaf surface. We developed an in vitro method to study phenotypic profile responses of bacterial pure cultures to different bands of the visible light spectrum using monochromatic (blue: 460 nm; red: 660 nm) and polychromatic (white: 350-990 nm) LEDs, by modification and optimization of a protocol for the Phenotype MicroArray™ technique (Biolog Inc., CA, USA). The new protocol revealed high reproducibility of substrate utilization under all conditions tested. Challenging the non-phototrophic bacterium Pseudomonas sp. DR 5-09 with white, blue, and red light demonstrated that all light treatments affected the respiratory profile differently, with blue LED having the most decisive impact on substrate utilization by impairing respiration of 140 substrates. The respiratory activity was decreased on 23 and 42 substrates under red and white LEDs, respectively, while utilization of one, 16, and 20 substrates increased in the presence of red, blue, and white LEDs, respectively. Interestingly, on four substrates contrasting utilization patterns were found when the bacterium was exposed to different light spectra. Although non-phototrophic bacteria do not rely directly on light as an energy source, Pseudomonas sp. DR 5-09 changed its respiratory activity on various substrates differently when exposed to different lights. Thus, ability to sense and distinguish between different wavelengths even within the visible light spectrum must exist, and leads to differential regulation of substrate usage. With these results, we hypothesize that different light spectra might be a hitherto neglected key stimulus for changes in microbial lifestyle and habits of substrate usage by non-phototrophic phyllospheric microbiota, and thus might essentially stratify leaf microbiota composition and diversity.

Indexed as

LightBiomassPlant LeavesPseudomonas

Identifiers

PMID29267321
PMCPMC5739431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.