ArticleAmerican journal of public health2018
Social Impact Bonds as a Funding Method for Health and Social Programs: Potential Areas of Concern.
Article in American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social impact bonds: opportunities for funding health promotion and disease prevention.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Cities as Platforms for Population Health: Past, Present, and Future.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- Declines in Spending Despite Positive Returns on Investment: Understanding Public Health's Wrong Pocket Problem.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- "Pay for Success" Projects: Financing Interventions That Address Social Determinants of Health in 20 Countries.American journal of public health · 2018Article
- Social Impact Bonds: A Promising Public-Private Partnership Model for Public Health.American journal of public health · 2018Article
- The 'wrong pocket' problem as a barrier to the integration of telehealth in health organisations and systems.Digital healthArticle
- A scoping review of strategies for financing the implementation of evidence-based practices in behavioral health systems: State of the literature and future directions.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) represent a new way to finance social service and health promotion programs whereby different types of investors provide an upfront investment of capital. If a given program meets predetermined criteria for a successful outcome, the government pays back investors with interest. Introduced in the United Kingdom in 2010, SIBs have since been implemented in the United States and across Europe, with some uptake in other jurisdictions. We identify and explore selected areas of concern related to SIBs, drawing from literature examining market-based reforms to health and social services and the evolution of the SIB funding mechanism. These areas of concern include increased costs to governments, restricted program scope, fragmented policymaking, undermining of public-sector service provision, mischaracterization of the root causes of social problems, and entrenchment of systemically produced vulnerabilities. We argue that it is essential to consider the long-term, aggregate, and contextualized effects of SIBs in order to evaluate their potential to contribute to public health. We conclude that such evaluations must explore the assumptions underlying the "common sense" arguments often used in support of SIBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.