ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2018
Grafting of Bioactive Polymers with Various Architectures: A Versatile Tool for Preparing Antibacterial Infection and Biocompatible Surfaces.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy via electron beam melting for the development of implants for the biomedical industry.Heliyon · 2021Review
- Harnessing biomolecules for bioinspired dental biomaterials.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this Research Article is to present three different techniques of poly(sodium styrene sulfonate) (polyNaSS) covalent grafting onto titanium (Ti) surfaces and study the influence of their architecture on biological response. Two of them are "grafting from" techniques requiring an activation step either by thermal or UV irradiation. The third method is a "grafting to" technique involving an anchorage molecule onto which polyNaSS synthesized by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization is clicked. The advantage of the "grafting to" technique when compared to the "grafting from" technique is the ability to control the architecture and length of the grafted polymers on the Ti surface and their influence on the biological responses. This investigation compares the effect of the three different grafting processes on the in vitro biological responses of bacteria and osteoblasts. Overall outcomes of this investigation confirmed the significance of the sulfonate functional groups on the biological responses, regardless of the grafting method. In addition, results showed that the architecture and distribution of grafted polyNaSS on Ti surfaces alter the intensity of the bacteria response mediated by fibronectin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.