Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266710›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2018

Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex-specific epidemiology of infection.

Matthew J Silk, Nicola L Weber, Lucy C Steward, David J Hodgson, Mike Boots, Darren P Croft, Richard J Delahay, Robbie A McDonald

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EnhancedOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. The ecology of ageing in wild societies: linking age structure and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Behavioural ecology and infectious disease: implications for conservation of biodiversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew J SilkEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Nicola L WeberCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Lucy C StewardEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
David J HodgsonCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Mike BootsCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
Darren P CroftCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Richard J DelahayNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Nympsfield, Stonehouse, GL10 3UJ, UK.
Robbie A McDonaldEnvironment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE, UK.
University of Exeter · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex-related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex-biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgers Meles meles naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male-male and between-sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female-female networks and that in male-male and between-sex contact networks, but not female-female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male-biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between-group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex-related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases.

Indexed as

MustelidaeMycobacterium bovisTuberculosis, BovineAnimalsCattleFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsSocial BehaviorTuberculosisBadgerbovine tuberculosisepidemiologyexponential random graph modelmultilayer networkreproductive behaviourSocial structurezoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID29266710
PMCPMC6849844
OpenAlexW2770167207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.