Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266673›Full record

ReviewGlia2018

Migratory potential of transplanted glial progenitors as critical factor for successful translation of glia replacement therapy: The gap between mice and men.

Rohit K Srivastava, Jeff W M Bulte, Piotr Walczak, Miroslaw Janowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Glia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rohit K SrivastavaDivision of MR Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jeff W M BulteDivision of MR Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Piotr WalczakDivision of MR Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3733-3322
Miroslaw JanowskiDivision of MR Research, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5261-7975

Funding

Treatment of ALS based on transplantation of glial restricted progenitorsR01NS091110 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WALCZAK, PIOTR · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Image-Guided Stem Cell Therapy of Perinatal Asphyxia in a Large Animal ModelR01NS091100 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWSKI, MIROSLAW · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Label-Free Imaging of Composite Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels in Regenerative MedicineR01EB023647 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W. · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
A Multimodal MRI Approach for Probing ALS Pathophysiology and NeurorepairR56NS098520 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BULTE, JEFF W. · 2017 to 2017
$424k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023647NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091100NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091110NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS098520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological disorders are a major threat to public health. Stem cell-based regenerative medicine is now a promising experimental paradigm for its treatment, as shown in pre-clinical animal studies. Initial attempts have been on the replacement of neuronal cells only, but glial progenitors (GPs) are now becoming strong alternative cellular therapeutic candidates to replace oligodendrocytes and astrocytes as knowledge accumulates about their important emerging role in various disease processes. There are many examples of successful therapeutic outcomes for transplanted GPs in small animal models, but clinical translation has proved to be challenging due to the 1,000-fold larger volume of the human brain compared to mice. Human GPs transplanted into the mouse brain migrate extensively and can induce global cell replacement, but a similar extent of migration in the human brain would only allow for local rather than global cell replacement. We review here the mechanisms that govern cell migration, which could potentially be exploited to enhance the migratory properties of GPs through cell engineering pre-transplantation. We furthermore discuss the (dis)advantages of the various cell delivery routes that are available, with particular emphasis on intra-arterial injection as the most suitable route for achieving global cell distribution in the larger brain. Now that therapeutic success has proven to be feasible in small animal models, future efforts will need to be directed to enhance global cell delivery and migration to make bench-to-bedside translation a reality.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsCell MovementHumansMiceNeural Stem CellsNeurogliaSpecies Specificityglial progenitorsmigrationmyelinneurological disordertransplantation

Identifiers

PMID29266673
PMCPMC5851824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.