ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018
The Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire for self-assessment of basic symptoms in the early detection of psychosis-Factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity.
Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theory of mind in schizophrenia through a clinical liability approach: a sib-pair study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Assessment of cognitive impairment in psychosis spectrum disorders through self-reported and interview-based measures.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022Article
- Basic symptoms of schizophrenia are related to symptoms of traumatic stress: A pivotal role of sensitization. An observational study.Medicine · 2022Observational
- The Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire for self-assessment of basic symptoms in the early detection of psychosis-Factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with schizophrenia often experience subtle disturbances in several domains of information processing-so-called basic symptoms (BS). BS are already present before onset of frank psychosis and can be assessed by interviews but also by the self-administered Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ). We investigated the factor structure, reliability, and predictive validity for transition to psychosis of the FCQ, comparing previously proposed factor solutions containing 1, 2, 4, and 10 factors.
methodsConfirmatory factor analysis was used in a sample of 117 at-risk mental state and 92 first-episode psychosis participants of the Basel FePsy (early detection of psychosis) study.
resultsAlthough all factor models fitted to the data, the 2- or 4-factor solutions performed best among the models that used at least half of the FCQ items, suggesting the covariance between FCQ items is best explained by 2 to 4 underlying factors. No FCQ-scale predicted transition to psychosis.
conclusionWe could confirm a 2- to 4-factor structure of the FCQ in a sample of at-risk mental state and first-episode psychosis patients using confirmatory factor analysis. Contrary to interview-assessed cognitive-perceptive BS, self-assessed BS do not seem to improve prediction of psychosis. This result reinforces reports of poor correspondence between interview- and questionnaire-assessed BS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.