Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266510›Full record

ReviewHippocampus2020

The content of hippocampal "replay".

Brad E Pfeiffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hippocampus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The recursive grammar of mental time travel.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Rest to Promote Learning: A Brain Default Mode Network Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brad E PfeifferDepartment of Neuroscience, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, 75390.ORCID 0000-0002-4608-2393

Funding

Mechanisms of expression and relationship between two distinct types of internally generated hippocampal sequencesR01NS104829 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PFEIFFER, BRAD E · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most striking features of the hippocampal network is its ability to self-generate neuronal sequences representing temporally compressed, spatially coherent paths. These brief events, often termed "replay" in the scientific literature, are largely confined to non-exploratory states such as sleep or quiet rest. Early studies examining the content of replay noted a strong correlation between the encoded spatial information and the animal's prior behavior; thus, replay was initially hypothesized to play a role in memory formation and/or systems-level consolidation via "off-line" reactivation of previous experiences. However, recent findings indicate that replay may also serve as a memory retrieval mechanism to guide future behavior or may be an incidental reflection of pre-existing network assemblies. Here, I will review what is known regarding the content of replay events and their correlation with past and future actions, and I will discuss how this knowledge might inform or constrain models which seek to explain the circuit-level mechanisms underlying these events and their role in mnemonic processes.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsHippocampusMemoryMemory ConsolidationNeuronsPlace CellsSleepmemoryplace cellsreactivationreviewripple

Identifiers

PMID29266510
PMCPMC7027863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.