Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266404›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018

Effect of connective tissue growth factor delivered via porous sutures on the proliferative stage of intrasynovial tendon repair.

Stephen W Linderman, Hua Shen, Susumu Yoneda, Rohith Jayaram, Michael L Tanes, Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert, Younan Xia, Stavros Thomopoulos, Richard H Gelberman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The use of connective tissue growth factor mimics for flexor tendon repair.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Growth Factor Expression During Healing in 3 Distinct Tendons.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2022
    Article
  8. Bringing tendon biology to heel: Leveraging mechanisms of tendon development, healing, and regeneration to advance therapeutic strategies.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  9. The cellular basis of fibrotic tendon healing: challenges and opportunities.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Biomaterials to Mimic and Heal Connective Tissues.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen W LindermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-1797-5870
Hua ShenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri.
Susumu YonedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri.
Rohith JayaramDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri.
Michael L TanesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Shelly E Sakiyama-ElbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
Younan XiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Stavros ThomopoulosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 650 W 168 ST, Black Building 1408, New York, 10025, New York.
Richard H GelbermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, 63110, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USColumbia University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

The Role of the Osteoblast Secretome in Bone FormationP30AR057235 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ORNITZ, DAVID M · 2009 to 2018
$5.7M
Enhanced Tendon Healing Through Growth Factor and Cell TherapiesR01AR062947 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GELBERMAN, RICHARD H, THOMOPOULOS, STAVROS · 2012 to 2022
$5.5M
Skeletal Disorders Training ProgramT32AR060719 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Roberto Civitelli · 2011 to 2026
$4.6M
Improved orthopaedic repairs through mechanically optimized, adhesive biomaterialsF30AR069491 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LINDERMAN, STEPHEN W · 2016 to 2018
$140k
NIAMS NIH HHS F30 AR069491NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR057235NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062947NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR060719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent growth factor, cell, and scaffold-based experimental interventions for intrasynovial flexor tendon repair have demonstrated therapeutic potential in rodent models. However, these approaches have not achieved consistent functional improvements in large animal trials due to deleterious inflammatory reactions to delivery materials and insufficient induction of targeted biological healing responses. In this study, we achieved porous suture-based sustained delivery of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) into flexor tendons in a clinically relevant canine model. Repairs with CTGF-laden sutures were mechanically competent and did not show any evidence of adhesions or other negative inflammatory reactions based on histology, gene expression, or proteomics analyses at 14 days following repair. CTGF-laden sutures induced local cellular infiltration and a significant biological response immediately adjacent to the suture, including histological signs of angiogenesis and collagen deposition. There were no evident widespread biological effects throughout the tendon substance. There were significant differences in gene expression of the macrophage marker CD163 and anti-apoptotic factor BCL2L1; however, these differences were not corroborated by proteomics analysis. In summary, this study provided encouraging evidence of sustained delivery of biologically active CTGF from porous sutures without signs of a negative inflammatory reaction. With the development of a safe and effective method for generating a positive local biological response, future studies can explore additional methods for enhancing intrasynovial tendon repair. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2052-2063, 2018.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocyticbcl-X ProteinBiomechanical PhenomenaCD163 AntigenCell ProliferationCollagenConnective Tissue Growth FactorDogsFemaleInflammationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMacrophagesMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPorosityAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocyticbcl-X ProteinCD163 AntigenCollagenConnective Tissue Growth FactorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsReceptors, Cell Surfaceconnective tissue growth factorCTGFdrug deliveryflexor tendonporous suture

Identifiers

PMID29266404
PMCPMC6013340
OpenAlexW2777833766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.