Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266381›Full record

ArticleCancer2018

Bone biopsy protocol for advanced prostate cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Verena Sailer, Marc H Schiffman, Myriam Kossai, Joanna Cyrta, Shaham Beg, Brian Sullivan, Bradley B Pua, Kyungmouk Steve Lee, Adam D Talenfeld, David M Nanus and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phase II Multicenter Study of Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer to Identify Mechanisms Driving Resistance.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Verena SailerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-2605
Marc H SchiffmanDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Myriam KossaiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Joanna CyrtaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Shaham BegDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Brian SullivanDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Bradley B PuaDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Kyungmouk Steve LeeDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Adam D TalenfeldDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
David M NanusSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Scott T TagawaSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Brian D RobinsonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Rema A RaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Chantal PauliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Rohan BarejaCaryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Luis S BeltranDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Alexandros SigarasCaryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Kenneth Wa EngCaryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Olivier ElementoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Andrea SbonerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Mark A RubinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Himisha BeltranCaryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Juan Miguel MosqueraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) SPORE in Prostate CancerP50CA211024 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GUDAS, LORRAINE J · 2017 to 2021
$10.9M
Epitomic Biomarkers of Prostate CancerU01CA111275 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M, RUBIN, MARK A. · 2004 to 2015
$6.8M
Molecular Signatures of Lethal and Indolent Prostate CancerR01CA116337 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI RUBIN, MARK A. · 2006 to 2016
$5.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211024NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116337NCI NIH HHS U01 CA111275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic biopsies are increasingly being performed in patients with advanced prostate cancer to search for actionable targets and/or to identify emerging resistance mechanisms. Due to a predominance of bone metastases and their sclerotic nature, obtaining sufficient tissue for clinical and genomic studies is challenging.

methodsPatients with prostate cancer bone metastases were enrolled between February 2013 and March 2017 on an institutional review board-approved protocol for prospective image-guided bone biopsy. Bone biopsies and blood clots were collected fresh. Compact bone was subjected to formalin with a decalcifying agent for diagnosis; bone marrow and blood clots were frozen in optimum cutting temperature formulation for next-generation sequencing. Frozen slides were cut from optimum cutting temperature cryomolds and evaluated for tumor histology and purity. Tissue was macrodissected for DNA and RNA extraction, and whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing were performed.

resultsSeventy bone biopsies from 64 patients were performed. Diagnostic material confirming prostate cancer was successful in 60 of 70 cases (85.7%). The median DNA/RNA yield was 25.5 ng/μL and 16.2 ng/μL, respectively. Whole-exome sequencing was performed successfully in 49 of 60 cases (81.7%), with additional RNA sequencing performed in 20 of 60 cases (33.3%). Recurrent alterations were as expected, including those involving the AR, PTEN, TP53, BRCA2, and SPOP genes.

conclusionsThis prostate cancer bone biopsy protocol ensures a valuable source for high-quality DNA and RNA for tumor sequencing and may be used to detect actionable alterations and resistance mechanisms in patients with bone metastases. Cancer 2018;124:1008-15. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone and BonesBone NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPrecision MedicineProspective StudiesProstateProstatic Neoplasmsbiopsybone metastasesDNAnext-generation sequencing (NGS)precision medicineprostate cancerRNA

Identifiers

PMID29266381
PMCPMC5821525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.