Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266197›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2018

Phages of life - the path to pharma.

Amanda Forde, Colin Hill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complementary killing activities ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effective reduction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Considerations and Caveats in Combating ESKAPE Pathogens against Nosocomial Infections.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbiota and Phage Therapy: Future Challenges in Medicine.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bacteriophages: Protagonists of a Post-Antibiotic Era.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  20. Phages of life - the path to pharma.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda FordeAPC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6005-1112
Colin HillSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-1445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has encountered both enthusiasm and scepticism in the past century. New antimicrobial strategies against lethal pathogens are now a top priority for the World Health Organization, and although compassionate use of phages recently met with significant success, regulated clinical interventions seem unlikely in the near future. The hundredth anniversary of their discovery seems an appropriate time for a revival of phage therapy, particularly as the dilemma of antibiotic resistance grows. Phages are ubiquitous in the environment, on our food and in and on our bodies. Their influence on human health is currently being evaluated, and in this mini-review, we examine data from recent metagenomic studies that propose a role for phages in the structure of the microbiome and in health and disease. We assess evidence for phages as vehicles for gene transfer in the context of antibiotic resistance and discuss challenges and opportunities along the critical path from phage discovery to a patient-focused pharmaceutical intervention.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophagesDrug IndustryHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29266197
PMCPMC5773946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.