Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266098›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

Easi-CRISPR for creating knock-in and conditional knockout mouse models using long ssDNA donors.

Hiromi Miura, Rolen M Quadros, Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy, Masato Ohtsuka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stress triggers global histone synthesis in the liver.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. TECTB Variants Reveal Tectorial Membrane Vulnerability in Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Frameshift Mutations in Exon 1 ofJournal of developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Deletion of Ybx1 results in germ cell hypoplasia in mouse embryos.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. New knock-in mouse linesJBMR plus · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hiromi MiuraDepartment of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Rolen M QuadrosMouse Genome Engineering Core Facility, Vice Chancellor for Research Office, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Channabasavaiah B GurumurthyMouse Genome Engineering Core Facility, Vice Chancellor for Research Office, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-4033
Masato OhtsukaDepartment of Molecular Life Science, Division of Basic Medical Science and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

UNMC Histology/Imaging and Creighton University Imaging Core FacilityP30GM110768 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHELLEY D · 2014 to 2018
$5.1M
The Molecular Biology of Neurosurgery SystemsP20GM103471 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SHELLEY D · 2012 to 2013
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103471NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing can easily generate knockout mouse models by disrupting the gene sequence, but its efficiency for creating models that require either insertion of exogenous DNA (knock-in) or replacement of genomic segments is very poor. The majority of mouse models used in research involve knock-in (reporters or recombinases) or gene replacement (e.g., conditional knockout alleles containing exons flanked by LoxP sites). A few methods for creating such models have been reported that use double-stranded DNA as donors, but their efficiency is typically 1-10% and therefore not suitable for routine use. We recently demonstrated that long single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) serve as very efficient donors, both for insertion and for gene replacement. We call this method efficient additions with ssDNA inserts-CRISPR (Easi-CRISPR) because it is a highly efficient technology (efficiency is typically 30-60% and reaches as high as 100% in some cases). The protocol takes ∼2 months to generate the founder mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA, Single-StrandedFemaleGene EditingGene Knock-In TechniquesGene Knockout TechniquesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID29266098
PMCPMC6058056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.