Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29266097›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

Single-cell microscopy of suspension cultures using a microfluidics-assisted cell screening platform.

Burak Okumus, Charles J Baker, Juan Carlos Arias-Castro, Ghee Chuan Lai, Emanuele Leoncini, Somenath Bakshi, Scott Luro, Dirk Landgraf, Johan Paulsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploiting Device Deformability for Fluid and Particle Manipulation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cell Separations and Sorting.Analytical chemistry · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Burak OkumusDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Charles J BakerDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Juan Carlos Arias-CastroDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ghee Chuan LaiDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emanuele LeonciniDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Somenath BakshiDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Scott LuroDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dirk LandgrafDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Johan PaulssonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard University · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Limits and Trade-offs of Feedback ControlR01GM081563 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Johan Paulsson · 2008 to 2026
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies that rely on fluorescence imaging of nonadherent cells that are cultured in suspension, such as Escherichia coli, are often hampered by trade-offs that must be made between data throughput and imaging resolution. We developed a platform for microfluidics-assisted cell screening (MACS) that overcomes this trade-off by temporarily immobilizing suspension cells within a microfluidics chip. This enables high-throughput and automated single-cell microscopy for a wide range of cell types and sizes. As cells can be rapidly sampled directly from a suspension culture, MACS bypasses the need for sample preparation, and therefore allows measurements without perturbing the native cell physiology. The setup can also be integrated with complex growth chambers, and can be used to enrich or sort the imaged cells. Furthermore, MACS facilitates the visualization of individual cytoplasmic fluorescent proteins (FPs) in E. coli, allowing low-abundance proteins to be counted using standard total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Finally, MACS can be used to impart mechanical pressure for assessing the structural integrity of individual cells and their response to mechanical perturbations, or to make cells take up chemicals that otherwise would not pass through the membrane. This protocol describes the assembly of electronic control circuitry, the construction of liquid-handling components and the creation of the MACS microfluidics chip. The operation of MACS is described, and automation software is provided to integrate MACS control with image acquisition. Finally, we provide instructions for extending MACS using an external growth chamber (1 d) and for how to sort rare cells of interest.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesEquipment DesignEscherichia coliMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopySingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29266097
PMCPMC6059380
OpenAlexW2779804884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.