ArticleRehabilitation psychology2017
Factor structure of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in individuals with acquired brain injury.
Article in Rehabilitation psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can we trust computers to assess the cognition of stroke patients? A systematic review.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Psychometric validation of the NIH Toolbox for use with individuals with phenylketonuria: Evidence from the PHEFREE consortium longitudinal study.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026Article
- Technology-Enabled Cognitive Strategy Intervention for Secondary Stroke Prevention: A Feasibility Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating cognitive performance using cognitive performance using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery in children with traumatic brain injury.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025Article
- Evaluating the factor structure and construct validity of the NIH toolbox in older adults, with a focus on cognitive normalcy and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: considerations for diversity, including insights from persons over 85 years of age and Black older Americans.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025Article
- Validity of the NIH toolbox cognitive battery in a healthy oldest-old 85+ sample.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2023Article
- Graph-matching distance between individuals' functional connectomes varies with relatedness, age, and cognitive score.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Dissociable language and executive control deficits and recovery in post-stroke aphasia: An exploratory observational and case series study.Neuropsychologia · 2022Observational
- Executive control deficits and lesion correlates in acute left hemisphere stroke survivors with and without aphasia.Brain imaging and behavior · 2022Article
- Shared functional connections within and between cortical networks predict cognitive abilities in adult males and females.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Distinct functional and structural connections predict crystallised and fluid cognition in healthy adults.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Fluid Cognitive Abilities Are Important for Learning and Retention of a New, Explicitly Learned Walking Pattern in Individuals After Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2021Article
- Latent Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in an Alzheimer's Disease Research Sample.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2021Article
- Post-stroke cognitive impairments and responsiveness to motor rehabilitation: A review.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020Article
- Comparability of iPad and Web-Based NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery Administration in Veterans.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2019Article
- The clinical utility and construct validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with disabilities.Rehabilitation psychology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) measures reading, vocabulary, episodic memory, working memory, executive functioning, and processing speed. While previous research has validated the factor structure in healthy adults, the factor structure has not been examined in adults with neurological impairments. Thus, this study evaluated the NIHTB-CB factor structure in individuals with acquired brain injury.
methodA sample of 392 individuals (ages 18-84) with acquired brain injury (n = 182 TBI, n = 210 stroke) completed the NIHTB-CB along with neuropsychological tests as part of a larger, multisite research project.
resultsConfirmatory factor analyses supported a 5-factor solution that included reading, vocabulary, episodic memory, working memory, and processing speed/executive functioning. This structure generally held in TBI and stroke subsamples as well as in subsamples of those with severe TBI and stroke injuries.
conclusionsThe factor structure of the NIHTB-CB is similar in adults with acquired brain injury to adults from the general population. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical practice and clinical research. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.