Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29265832›Full record

SynthesisJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2018

A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: Technical, relational, and conditional process models of change.

Molly Magill, Timothy R Apodaca, Brian Borsari, Jacques Gaume, Ariel Hoadley, Rebecca E F Gordon, J Scott Tonigan, Theresa Moyers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04666831 (Adapted Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Food Addiction), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
37.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04666831 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Adapted Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Food Addiction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorToronto Metropolitan UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsFood Addiction, Binge EatingArmsAdapted Motivational Interviewing (AMI) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 315 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Change talk subtypes as predictors of alcohol use following brief motivational intervention.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Differential mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing versus health education for smoking cessation induction.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Trial
  17. Development of the Motivational Interviewing Coach Rating Scale (MI-CRS) for health equity implementation contexts.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Molly MagillCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
Timothy R ApodacaChildren's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri- Kansas City School of Medicine.
Brian BorsariSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health System.
Jacques GaumeDepartment of Community Health and Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-0994
Ariel HoadleyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-0358
Rebecca E F GordonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.ORCID 0000-0003-2296-4794
J Scott ToniganDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico.
Theresa Moyers
John Brown University · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Within-Session Mechanisms of Behavior Change in At-Risk College StudentsR01AA017427 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Trauma, Trauma Sequela, and Alcohol Information ProcessingR01AA016564 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI READ, JENNIFER P. · 2008 to 2012
$1.0M
Technical, Relational, & Conditional Process Models of MI Efficacy: Meta-AnalysisR21AA023662 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2015 to 2016
$423k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016564NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017427NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA023662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the present meta-analysis, we test the technical and relational hypotheses of Motivational Interviewing (MI) efficacy. We also propose an a priori conditional process model where heterogeneity of technical path effect sizes should be explained by interpersonal/relational (i.e., empathy, MI Spirit) and intrapersonal (i.e., client treatment seeking status) moderators.

methodA systematic review identified k = 58 reports, describing 36 primary studies and 40 effect sizes (N = 3,025 participants). Statistical methods calculated the inverse variance-weighted pooled correlation coefficient for the therapist to client and the client to outcome paths across multiple target behaviors (i.e., alcohol use, other drug use, other behavior change).

resultsTherapist MI-consistent skills were correlated with more client change talk (r = .55, p < .001) as well as more sustain talk (r = .40, p < .001). MI-inconsistent skills were correlated with more sustain talk (r = .16, p < .001), but not change talk. When these indicators were combined into proportions, as recommended in the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code, the overall technical hypothesis was supported. Specifically, proportion MI consistency was related to higher proportion change talk (r = .11, p = .004) and higher proportion change talk was related to reductions in risk behavior at follow up (r = -.16, p < .001). When tested as two independent effects, client change talk was not significant, but sustain talk was positively associated with worse outcome (r = .19, p < .001). Finally, the relational hypothesis was not supported, but heterogeneity in technical hypothesis path effect sizes was partially explained by inter- and intrapersonal moderators.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides additional support for the technical hypothesis of MI efficacy; future research on the relational hypothesis should occur in the field rather than in the context of clinical trials. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

HumansMotivational InterviewingOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID29265832
PMCPMC5958907
OpenAlexW2777220936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.