Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29265745›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

Use of infant formula in the ELFE study: The association with social and health-related factors.

Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain, Camille Davisse-Paturet, Sandrine Lioret, Eléa Ksiazek, Corinne Bois, Marie-Noëlle Dufourg, Marie Bournez, Sophie Nicklaus, Sandra Wagner, Marie Aline Charles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Blandine de Lauzon-GuillainUMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Early Origin of Child Health and Development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5887-8842
Camille Davisse-PaturetUMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Early Origin of Child Health and Development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, Paris, France.
Sandrine LioretUMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Early Origin of Child Health and Development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, Paris, France.
Eléa KsiazekCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Corinne BoisUnité mixte Inserm-Ined-EFS Elfe, INED, Paris, France.
Marie-Noëlle DufourgUnité mixte Inserm-Ined-EFS Elfe, INED, Paris, France.
Marie BournezCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9666-0350
Sophie NicklausCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Sandra WagnerUMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Early Origin of Child Health and Development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, Paris, France.
Marie Aline CharlesUMR1153 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center (CRESS), Early Origin of Child Health and Development Team (ORCHAD), INSERM, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is recommended until 6 months of age, but a wide range of infant formula is available for nonbreastfed or partially breastfed infants. Our aim was to describe infant formula selection and to examine social- and health-related factors associated with this selection. Analyses were based on 13,291 infants from the French national birth cohort Etude Longitudinale Française depuis l'Enfance. Infant diet was assessed at Month 2 by phone interview and monthly from Months 3 to 10 via internet/paper questionnaires. Infant formulas were categorized in 6 groups: extensively or partially hydrolysed, regular with or without prebiotics/probiotics, and thickened with or without prebiotics/probiotics. Associations between type of infant formula used at 2 months and family or infant characteristics were assessed by multinomial logistic regressions. At Month 2, 58.1% of formula-fed infants were fed with formula enriched in prebiotics/probiotics, 31.5% with thickened formula, and 1.4% with extensively hydrolysed formula. The proportion of formula-fed infants increased regularly, but the type of infant formula used was fairly stable between 2 and 10 months. At Month 2, extensively hydrolysed formulas were more likely to be used in infants with diarrhoea or regurgitation problems. Partially hydrolysed formulas were more often used in families with high income, with a history of allergy, or with infants with regurgitation issues. Thickened formulas were used more with boys, preterm infants, infants with regurgitation issues, or in cases of early maternal return to work. The main factors related to the selection of infant formula were family and infant health-related ones.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentFamily CharacteristicsFeeding MethodsInfant FormulaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultBreast FeedingCohort StudiesEducational StatusFemaleFood IntoleranceFranceHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePrebioticsProtein Hydrolysatesbirth cohortformula milkhealth-related factorsinfancysociodemographic factors

Identifiers

PMID29265745
PMCPMC6865948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.