Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29265672›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2018

The effect of an attachment-oriented couple intervention for breast cancer patients and partners in the early treatment phase: A randomised controlled trial.

A Nicolaisen, M Hagedoorn, D G Hansen, H L Flyger, R Christensen, N Rottmann, P B Lunn, H Terp, K Soee, C Johansen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of marital self-disclosure on marital relationship and psychological outcome for cancer patients: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention among women with gynecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of couple-based intervention on sexuality and the quality of life of cancer patients and their partners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

A NicolaisenNational Research Centre for Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-7144
M HagedoornDepartment of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
D G HansenNational Research Centre for Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
H L FlygerDepartment of Breast Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
R ChristensenNational Research Centre for Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
N RottmannNational Research Centre for Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
P B LunnDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Breast Surgery, Ringsted Hospital, Ringsted, Denmark.
H TerpNational Research Centre for Cancer Rehabilitation, Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
K SoeeCentre for Breast Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
C JohansenDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Survivorship, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKHerlev Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKRingsted Sygehus · DKUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients and partners both cope individually and as a dyad with challenges related to a breast cancer diagnosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a psychological attachment-oriented couple intervention for breast cancer patients and partners in the early treatment phase.

methodsA randomised controlled trial including 198 recently diagnosed breast cancer patients and their partners. Couples were randomised to the Hand in Hand (HiH) intervention in addition to usual care or to usual care only. Self-report assessments were conducted for both patients and partners at baseline, postintervention (5 months), and follow-up (10 months), assessing cancer-related distress, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and dyadic adjustment. Patients' cancer-related distress was the primary outcome.

resultsCancer-related distress decreased over time in both patients and partners, but the intervention did not significantly affect this decrease at postintervention (P = .08) or follow-up (P = .71). A significant positive effect was found on dyadic adjustment at follow-up for both patients (P = .04) and partners (P = .02).

conclusionsThere was no significant effect of the HiH intervention cancer-related distress. The results suggest that most couples can cope with cancer-related distress in the context of usual care. However, the positive effect on dyadic adjustment implies that the HiH intervention benefitted both patients and partners. Future studies should investigate how to integrate a couple focus in usual cancer care to improve dyadic coping in the early treatment phase.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsObject AttachmentOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCouples TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpousesStress, Psychologicalattachmentbreast cancercouplesdistressdyadic coping

Identifiers

PMID29265672
PMCPMC5873374
OpenAlexW2779057174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.