Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29265483›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Affective and cooperative social interactions modulate effective connectivity within and between the mirror and mentalizing systems.

Maria Arioli, Daniela Perani, Stefano Cappa, Alice Mado Proverbio, Alberto Zani, Andrea Falini, Nicola Canessa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Human Mentalizing as Rational Probabilistic Inference.Computational brain & behavior · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mind your step: social cerebellum in interactive navigation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Finding the neural correlates of collaboration using a three-person fMRI hyperscanning paradigm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria ArioliNEtS Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Daniela PeraniDivision of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Stefano CappaNEtS Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Alice Mado ProverbioDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, NeuroMi - Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, 20126, Italy.
Alberto ZaniInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, IBFM-CNR, Milan, 20125, Italy.
Andrea FaliniDivision of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Nicola CanessaNEtS Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, 27100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0179-6384
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoding the meaning of others' actions, a crucial step for social cognition, involves different neural mechanisms. While the "mirror" and "mentalizing" systems have been associated with, respectively, the processing of biological actions versus more abstract information, their respective contribution to intention understanding is debated. Processing social interactions seems to recruit both neural systems, with a different weight depending on cues emphasizing either shared action goals or shared mental states. We have previously shown that observing cooperative and affective social interactions elicits stronger activity in key nodes of, respectively, the mirror (left posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS), superior parietal cortex (SPL), and ventral/dorsal premotor cortex (vPMC/dPMC)) and mentalizing (ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)) systems. To unveil their causal organization, we investigated the effective connectivity underlying the observation of human social interactions expressing increasing cooperativity (involving left pSTS, SPL, and vPMC) versus affectivity (vmPFC) via dynamic causal modeling in 36 healthy human subjects. We found strong evidence for a model including the pSTS and vPMC as input nodes for the observed interactions. The extrinsic connectivity of this model undergoes oppositely valenced modulations, with cooperativity promoting positive modulations of connectivity between pSTS and both SPL (forward) and vPMC (mainly backward), and affectivity promoting reciprocal positive modulations of connectivity between pSTS and vmPFC (mainly backward). Alongside fMRI data, such divergent effective connectivity suggests that different dimensions underlying the processing of social interactions recruit distinct, although strongly interconnected, neural pathways associated with, respectively, the bottom-up visuomotor processing of motor intentions, and the top-down attribution of affective/mental states.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorSocial PerceptionAdultBrainBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMirror NeuronsModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysTheory of Minddynamic causal modelingeffective connectivityintention understandingmentalizing systemmirror neuron systemsocial cognitionsocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID29265483
PMCPMC6866589
OpenAlexW2776572198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.