SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06267118 (A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Comparative Efficacy of Hypertonic Saline vs Adrenaline Nebulization in Acute Bronchiolitis in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Comparative Efficacy of Hypertonic Saline vs Adrenaline Nebulization in Acute Bronchiolitis in Children
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Immunoglobulin treatment for hospitalised infants and young children with respiratory syncytial virus infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Emergency care interventions for paediatric severe acute respiratory infections in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Parenteral versus enteral fluid therapy for children hospitalised with bronchiolitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Magnesium sulphate for treating acute bronchiolitis in children up to two years of age.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring the efficacy of using hypertonic saline for nebulizing treatment in children with bronchiolitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluating the Placebo Status of Nebulized Normal Saline in Patients With Acute Viral Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy of salbutamol in the treatment of infants with bronchiolitis: A meta-analysis of 13 studies.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Immunoglobulin treatment for hospitalised infants and young children with respiratory syncytial virus infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Nebulized hypertonic saline 3% for 1 versus 3 days in hospitalized bronchiolitis: a blinded non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2019Trial
- Is Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Beneficial in Children with Acute Asthma Exacerbation and Acute Bronchiolitis? A Retrospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infection in children in China.Pediatric investigation · 2025Article
- Efficacies of different treatment strategies for infants hospitalized with acute bronchiolitis.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Normal saline for children with bronchiolitis: study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Comparison of nebulised 3% hypertonic saline with ipratropium bromide in treatment of children with bronchiolitis: a randomized control trial.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Acute Viral Bronchiolitis: A Narrative Review.Journal of pediatric intensive care · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAirway oedema (swelling) and mucus plugging are the principal pathological features in infants with acute viral bronchiolitis. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution (≥ 3%) may reduce these pathological changes and decrease airway obstruction. This is an update of a review first published in 2008, and previously updated in 2010 and 2013.
objectivesTo assess the effects of nebulised hypertonic (≥ 3%) saline solution in infants with acute bronchiolitis. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science on 11 August 2017. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 8 April 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials using nebulised hypertonic saline alone or in conjunction with bronchodilators as an active intervention and nebulised 0.9% saline, or standard treatment as a comparator in children under 24 months with acute bronchiolitis. The primary outcome for inpatient trials was length of hospital stay, and the primary outcome for outpatients or emergency department trials was rate of hospitalisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias in included studies. We conducted random-effects model meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We used mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) as effect size metrics. MAIN
resultsWe identified 26 new trials in this update, of which 9 await classification due to insufficient data for eligibility assessment, and 17 trials (N = 3105) met the inclusion criteria. We included a total of 28 trials involving 4195 infants with acute bronchiolitis, of whom 2222 infants received hypertonic saline.Hospitalised infants treated with nebulised hypertonic saline had a statistically significant shorter mean length of hospital stay compared to those treated with nebulised 0.9% saline (MD -0.41 days, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.07; P = 0.02, I² = 79%; 17 trials; 1867 infants) (GRADE quality of evidence: low). Infants who received hypertonic saline also had statistically significant lower post-inhalation clinical scores than infants who received 0.9% saline in the first three days of treatment (day 1: MD -0.77, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.36, P < 0.001; day 2: MD -1.28, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.65, P < 0.001; day 3: MD -1.43, 95% CI -1.82 to -1.04, P < 0.001) (GRADE quality of evidence: low).Nebulised hypertonic saline reduced the risk of hospitalisation by 14% compared with nebulised 0.9% saline among infants who were outpatients and those treated in the emergency department (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98; P = 0.02, I² = 7%; 8 trials; 1723 infants) (GRADE quality of evidence: moderate).Twenty-four trials presented safety data: 13 trials (1363 infants, 703 treated with hypertonic saline) did not report any adverse events, and 11 trials (2360 infants, 1265 treated with hypertonic saline) reported at least one adverse event, most of which were mild and resolved spontaneously. AUTHORS'
conclusionsNebulised hypertonic saline may modestly reduce length of stay among infants hospitalised with acute bronchiolitis and improve clinical severity score. Treatment with nebulised hypertonic saline may also reduce the risk of hospitalisation among outpatients and emergency department patients. However, we assessed the quality of the evidence as low to moderate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.