Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29265002›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease2018

Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Prakash Krishnan, Arthur Tarricone, Purushothaman K-Raman, Farhan Majeed, Vishal Kapur, Karthik Gujja, Jose Wiley, Miguel Vasquez, Rheoneil A Lascano, Katherine G Quiles and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance During Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Costs From the Japanese Perspective.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. RotarexJournal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Prakash KrishnanMount Sinai Medical Center, 1 Gustave l Levy Place, Box 1080, New York, 10026, NY, USA.
Arthur TarriconeMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Purushothaman K-RamanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Farhan MajeedMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Vishal KapurMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Karthik GujjaMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Jose WileyMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Miguel VasquezMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Rheoneil A LascanoMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine G QuilesMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Tashanne DistinMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Ran FontenelleMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Farah Atallah-LajamMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Annapoorna KiniMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Samin SharmaMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Mount Sinai Hospital · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMount Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up.

conclusionsDirectional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Indexed as

AngiographyFemoral ArteryPopliteal ArteryStentsUltrasonography, InterventionalAgedAged, 80 and overAtherectomyConstriction, PathologicEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePredictive Value of Testsatherectomyin-stent restenosisintravascular ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID29265002
PMCPMC5933642
OpenAlexW2779921221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.