Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264835›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Clinical and molecular characteristics of gliosarcoma and modern prognostic significance relative to conventional glioblastoma.

Deborah R Smith, Cheng-Chia Wu, Heva J Saadatmand, Steven R Isaacson, Simon K Cheng, Michael B Sisti, Jeffrey N Bruce, Sameer A Sheth, Andrew B Lassman, Fabio M Iwamoto and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prognostic Factors of Gliosarcoma in the Real World: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Chasing a rarity: a retrospective single-center evaluation of prognostic factors in primary gliosarcoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancers · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah R SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Cheng-Chia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Heva J SaadatmandDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Steven R IsaacsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Simon K ChengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Michael B SistiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sameer A ShethDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew B LassmanHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Fabio M IwamotoHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shih-Hsiu WangDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Peter CanollHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Guy M McKhannDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Tony J C WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, CHONY North B11, New York, NY, 10032, USA. tjw2117@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

The Brief Research in Aging and Interdisciplinary NeurosciencesT35AG044303 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Sachin Agarwal, Jennifer Jaie Manly · 2013 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS T35 AG044303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliosarcoma is a rare histopathologic variant of glioblastoma traditionally associated with a poor prognosis. While gliosarcoma may represent a distinct clinical entity given its unique histologic composition and molecular features, its relative prognostic significance remains uncertain. While treatment of gliosarcoma generally encompasses the same standardized approach used in glioblastoma, supporting evidence is limited given its rarity. Here, we characterized 32 cases of gliosarcoma and retrospectively evaluated survival relative to 451 glioblastoma patients diagnosed during the same era within the same institution. Overall, we identified 22 primary gliosarcomas, representing 4.7% of WHO Grade IV primary glioblastomas, and 10 secondary gliosarcomas. With median age of 62, patients were predominately Caucasian (87.5%) and male (65.6%). Tumors with available molecular profiling were primarily MGMT-unmethylated (87.5%), IDH-1-preserved (100%) and EGFR wild-type (100%). Interestingly, while no significant median survival difference between primary gliosarcoma and glioblastoma was observed across the entire cohort (11.0 vs. 14.8 months, p = 0.269), median survival was worse for gliosarcoma specifically among patients who received modern temozolomide-based (TMZ) chemoradiotherapy (11.0 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.006). Matched-pair analysis also trended toward worse median survival among gliosarcomas (11.0 vs. 19.6 months, log-rank p = 0.177, Breslow p = 0.010). While adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.206, p = 0.035) and TMZ-based chemotherapy (HR 0.531, p = 0.000) appeared protective, gliosarcoma emerged as a significantly poor prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 3.27, p = 0.012). Collectively, our results suggest that gliosarcoma may still portend worse prognosis even with modern trimodality therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaGliosarcomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorGlioblastomaGliosarcomaNeuro-oncologyRadiotherapyTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID29264835
PMCPMC7297205
OpenAlexW2777070305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.