Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264834›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Temporal stability of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients undergoing STUPP protocol.

C J O'Regan, H Kearney, A Beausang, M A Farrell, F M Brett, J B Cryan, T E Loftus, P G Buckley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Drug resistance in glioblastoma: are persisters the key to therapy?Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Changes of OCancers · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C J O'ReganDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. carloregan@hotmail.com.
H KearneyDepartment of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
A BeausangDepartment of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M A FarrellDepartment of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F M BrettDepartment of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J B CryanDepartment of Neuropathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
T E LoftusDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
P G BuckleyGenomics Medicine Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Beaumont Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic silencing of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter via methylation in a glioblastoma (GBM), has been correlated with a more favourable response to alkylating chemotherapeutic agents such as temozolomide. The use of global methylation surrogates such as Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element 1 (LINE1) may also be valuable in order to fully understand these highly heterogeneous tumours. In this study, we analysed both original and recurrent GBMs in 22 patients (i.e. 44 tumours), for both MGMT and LINE1 methylation status. In the 22 patients: 14 (63.6%) displayed MGMT methylation stability in the recurrent GBM versus 8 (36.4%), with instability of methylation status. No significant differences in overall and progression free survival was evident between these two groups. LINE1 methylation status remained stable for 12 (54.5%) of recurrent GBM patients versus 9 (41%) of the patients with instability in LINE1 methylation status (p = 0.02), resulting in an increase in overall survival of the stable LINE1 group (p = 0.04). The results obtained demonstrated major epigenetic instability of GBMs treated with temozolomide as part of the STUPP protocol. GBMs appear to undergo selective evolution post-treatment, and have the ability to recur with a newly reprogrammed epigenetic status. Selective targeting of the altered epigenomes in recurrent GBMs may facilitate the future development of both prognostic biomarkers and enhanced therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultAgedAntineoplastic ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsEpigeneticsGlioblastomaMethylationMGMTTemzolamide

Identifiers

PMID29264834
OpenAlexW2776406960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.