ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018
Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: efficacy and safety study to guide future practice.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Current Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Gut and liver · 2020Pooled it
- Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Short- and long-term outcomes for early large esophageal carcinoma patients treated via double- and single-tunnel super minimally invasive surgery: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique: a new choice for gastrointestinal defect closure.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparative study on different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Muscular Injury Is a Risk Factor for Post-Entire Circumferential Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Stricture.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection better than endoscopic submucosal dissection in treating large superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Updates in the Field of Submucosal Endoscopy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Autologous skin-grafting surgery to prevent esophageal stenosis after complete circular endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a case-matched controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for rectal laterally spreading tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimsESTD and ESD are currently the two primary treatment options for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm (SESCN) in China. However, in larger cases, ESD proves to be technically challenging and time saving, whereas ESTD exhibits promising efficacy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two techniques for large SESCN. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 150 patients with solitary large SESCN that underwent either ESTD (n = 52) or ESD (n = 98) between August 2011 and June 2016 were included in this study. Both efficacy and safety clinical data were collected and analyzed.
resultsAll of the 150 patients were found to successfully undergo ESTD or ESD with 92.68 ± 67.96 (mean ± SD) min. The specimen area was measured to be 13.79 ± 7.44 (mean ± SD) cm
conclusionsESTD and ESD both were found to be effective and safe treatment options for the treatment of large SESCN. ESTD appeared to improve operation efficacy, which was reflected in a higher dissection speed compared with ESD. We also demonstrate that long operation times should be avoided as much as possible in order to reduce intra-operative adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.