Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264728›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2017

Interaction of PM2.5 airborne particulates with ZnO and TiO

Asli Baysal, Hasan Saygin, Gul Sirin Ustabasi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A New Look at the Effects of Engineered ZnO and TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Response of bioaerosol cells to photocatalytic inactivation with ZnO and TiOFrontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asli BaysalHealth Services Vocational School of Higher Education, T.C. Istanbul Aydin University, Sefakoy Kucukcekmece, 34295, Istanbul, Turkey. aslibaysal@aydin.edu.tr.
Hasan SayginApplication and Research Center for Advanced Studies, T.C. Istanbul Aydin University, Sefakoy Kucukcekmece, 34295, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gul Sirin UstabasiHealth Services Vocational School of Higher Education, T.C. Istanbul Aydin University, Sefakoy Kucukcekmece, 34295, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Aydın University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant knowledge gap in nanotechnology is the absence of standardized protocols for examining and comparison the effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on different environment media. Despite the large number of studies on ecotoxicity of nanoparticles, most of them disregard the particles physicochemical transformation under real exposure conditions and interaction with different environmental components like air, soil, water, etc. While one of the main exposure ways is inhalation and/or atmosphere for human and environment, there is no investigation between airborne particulates and nanoparticles. In this study, some metal oxide nanoparticle (ZnO and TiO

Indexed as

Air PollutantsEnvironmental MonitoringGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansNanoparticlesParticle SizeParticulate MatterSurface PropertiesTitaniumToxicity TestsZinc OxideAir PollutantsParticulate MatterTitaniumtitanium dioxideZinc OxideAir pollutionBacteriaNanoparticlesPM2.5 airborne particulatesToxic effectTransformation

Identifiers

PMID29264728
OpenAlexW2781355001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.