ArticleCell and tissue banking2018
Successful disinfection of femoral head bone graft using high hydrostatic pressure.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical comparison of high hydrostatic pressure versus liquid nitrogen treatment for devitalized bone grafts: a fresh porcine model study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Oncological Safety of High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment: Effects on Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-like Transdifferentiation of Adipose Stromal Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Deep-freezing and decontamination strategy for a large autologous bone graft with presentation of the osteogenic potential of resident osteoblasts.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Impact of high hydrostatic pressure on the cytokine profile and head and neck cancer cell behavior: implications for oncological safety.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Cellular transfection using rapid decrease in hydrostatic pressure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Safety and Reoperation Rates in Non-instrumented Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Secondary Report From a Randomized Controlled Trial of ABM/P-15 vs Allograft With Minimum 5 years Follow-Up.Global spine journal · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Integrity of Allogeneic Bone Processed with High Hydrostatic Pressure: A Pilot Animal Study.Biomaterials research · 2024Article
- Establishing safe high hydrostatic pressure devitalization thresholds for autologous head and neck cancer vaccination and reconstruction.Cell death discovery · 2023Article
- Comprehensive characterization of cell and tissue responses toward high hydrostatic pressure treatment: Molecular feedback and structural integrity in bone graft processing.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current standard for sterilization of potentially infected bone graft by gamma irradiation and thermal or chemical inactivation potentially deteriorates the biomechanical properties of the graft. We performed an in vitro experiment to evaluate the use of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP); which is widely used as a disinfection process in the food processing industry, to sterilize bone grafts. Four femoral heads were divided into five parts each, of which 16 were contaminated (in duplicate) with 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.