Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264583›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2017

Assessing the role of everolimus in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living donor liver transplantation for patients within the UCSF criteria: re-inventing the role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.

Ashok Thorat, Long-Bin Jeng, Horng-Ren Yang, Chun-Chieh Yeh, Shih-Chao Hsu, Te-Hung Chen, Kin-Shing Poon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashok ThoratOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Long-Bin JengOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Horng-Ren YangOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun-Chieh YehOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shih-Chao HsuOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Te-Hung ChenOrgan Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kin-Shing PoonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
China Medical University Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/

aimsThe protective effect of everolimus (EVR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who receive liver transplantation in terms of reducing the recurrence has not been sufficiently investigated in clinical trials. In this second stage of our ongoing study, we intend to analyze the effects of EVR as an immunosuppressant, when it is started in the early phase after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), on HCC recurrence in patients with HCC within the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) criteria.

methodsFrom January 2011 to June 2013, a total of 250 patients underwent LDLT for HCC at our institute. The patients with HCC within the UCSF criteria were included in the study and divided in two groups depending upon the postoperative immunosuppression. Group A: HCC patients that received EVR+TAC based immunosuppressive regimen (n=37). Group B: HCC patients that received standard TAC based immunosuppressive regimen without EVR (n=29). The target trough level for EVR was 3 to 5 ng/ml while for TAC it was 8-10 ng/ml.

resultsFor group A patients, the mean trough level of the EVR was 3.47±1.53 ng/ml (range, 1.5-11.2) with a daily dose of 1.00±0.25 mg/day. For group A and B, the average TAC trough levels were 6.97±3.98 ng/ml (range, 2.50 to 11.28 ng/ml) and 6.93±2.58 (range, 2-16.30), respectively. The 1-year, 3-year and 4-year overall survival achieved for Group A patients was 94.95%, 86.48% and 86.48%, respectively while for Group B patients it was 82.75%, 68.96%, and 62.06%, respectively (

conclusionsEVR use in liver transplant recipients in the early stage after transplantation reduces the HCC recurrence rates in HCC patients within the UCSF criteria.

Indexed as

EverolimusHepatic artery thrombosisHepatocellular carcinomaLiving donor liver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID29264583
PMCPMC5736740
OpenAlexW2777607156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.