Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264540›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Endocrine Society2017

Radiological Surveillance Screening in Asymptomatic Succinate Dehydrogenase Mutation Carriers.

Nicola Tufton, Anju Sahdev, Scott A Akker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Kidney Cancer, Version 1.2021.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Tumor risks and surveillance outcomes inEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Radiologic screening and surveillance in hereditary cancers.European journal of radiology open · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola TuftonDepartment of Endocrinology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.
Anju SahdevDepartment of Radiology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.
Scott A AkkerDepartment of Endocrinology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in the availability of testing for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) germline susceptibility genes. As more patients with genetic mutations are identified, cascade genetic testing of family members is also increasing. This results in identifying genetic predispositions at a much earlier age. With our current understanding of familial PPGL syndromes, lifelong surveillance is required. This review focuses on carriers of succinate dehydrogenase (

Indexed as

paragangliomaphaeochromocytomascreeningSDHBsuccinate dehydrogenasesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID29264540
PMCPMC5686572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.