ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2017
A Somewhat Bizarre Case of Graves Disease Due to Vitamin Treatment.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Differential Diagnosis of Discrepant Thyroid Function Tests: Insistent Pitfalls and Updated Flow-Chart Based on a Long-Standing Experience.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Biotin interference in TSH, FT4, and FT3 assays based on the LOCI technology: Identifying interference by dilution.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
- Pseudo-hyperthyroidism: Biotin interference in a case with renal failure.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextAccurate measurements of circulating hormones is essential for the practice of endocrinology. Immunometric assays employing the streptavidin-biotin system are widely used to measure hormones. However, these assays are susceptible to interference in patients taking biotin supplementations. This interference could mimic a coherent hormone profile, leading to misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: The patient, a 32-year-old man with X-linked adrenomyeloneuropathy recently diagnosed with Graves disease, was referred to our department to evaluate his response to antithyroid drugs. His thyroid function tests were still consistent with hyperthyroidism while he had been receiving carbimazole 40 mg/d for 6 weeks. We found no signs of thyrotoxicosis on physical examination despite the "frank and severe" biochemical hyperthyroidism. Noticing that all the patient's assays had been done at the same laboratory, we suspected assay interference. We therefore repeated the thyroid function tests at our hospital laboratory, which uses a different assay platform. Surprisingly, all the results were normal, confirming assay interference. The patient was taking an investigational "vitamin" therapy, which turned out to be biotin, prescribed at a dose of 100 mg tid as part of a trial of high-dose biotin in X-linked adrenomyeloneuropathy.
conclusionsThis case should encourage physicians to ask their patients about possible biotin intake, especially when laboratory results are not compatible with clinical findings. If biotin interference is suspected, we propose either using a different assay not based on the streptavidin-biotin system or repeating the analyses after stopping biotin supplementation for one week.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.