ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017
The next generation of rapid point-of-care testing identification tools for ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Multiplex PCR on Diagnosis of Bacterial and Fungal Infections and Choice of Appropriate Antimicrobial Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Targeted next-generation sequencing for pediatric lower respiratory tract infections: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Oral care medications for the prevention and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Article
- Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Literature Review.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Performance evaluation of the LumiraDx quantitative microfluidic point-of-care CRP test.Practical laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Ten Issues to Update in Nosocomial or Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia: An Expert Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Trends in Molecular Diagnosis of Nosocomial Pneumonia Classic PCR vs. Point-of-Care PCR: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Early appropriate diagnostics and treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Review
- Correlation between human health and reactive oxygen species produced in blood: a long-term chemiluminescence and fluorescence analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Technologies to Optimize the Care of Severe COVID-19 Patients for Health Care Providers Challenged by Limited Resources.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2020Review
- Update of the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Review
- Rapid and Point-of-Care Testing in Respiratory Tract Infections: An Antibiotic Guardian?ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2020Review
- Assessment of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for the Rapid Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria from Respiratory Samples in Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Article
- Suggestions for designing studies investigating diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Assessment of levels of D-dimer and interferon-γ in pediatric patients withExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a frequent issue in intensive care units (ICU), with a major impact on morbidity, mortality and cost of care. VAP diagnosis remains challenging: traditional culture-based microbiological techniques are still the gold-standard, but are too slow to enable clinicians to improve prognosis with timely antimicrobial therapy adjustment. Prolonged exposure to inappropriate antibiotics has also been shown to increase the incidence of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Point-of-care testing (POCT) tools are diagnostic testing methods that can be used at or near the bedside, with delays ranging from a couple minutes to a few hours. The use of POCTs for VAP could allow for faster diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy adjustments. Despite uncertainty regarding their diagnostic value, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can be detected using POCTs in few minutes. In VAP, CRP showed a sensitivity of 56% to 88% and specificity of 86% to 91%; PCT showed a sensitivity of 78% to 100% and a specificity between 75% and 97% using non-POCT methods. Automated microscopy could also be used in clinical ICU setting, with reported sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97%, allowing for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) in less than 12 h. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (MPCR) could allow for identification and AST approximation through the detection of drug-resistance genes in about 6 h, with reported sensitivity of 89.2% and specificity of 97.1%; although use as POCT was shown to result in test failure in about 40% of samples. Despite being at an early development stage, exhalome analysis, which allows for non-invasive fast identification, and chromogenic tests, more suited for the detection of drug-resistance enzymes, are also promising techniques for POCT diagnosis of VAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.