Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29264366›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017

Platelets: an outlook from biology through evidence-based achievements in critical care.

Rubens C Costa-Filho, Fernando A Bozza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Platelet subpopulations and contribution to hemostasis.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Effects of uridine and nucleotides on hemostasis parameters.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023
    Article
  4. Should COVID-19 be branded to viral thrombotic fever?Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2021
    Article
  5. Engineering Cell Membrane-Based Nanotherapeutics to Target Inflammation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rubens C Costa-FilhoDepartment of Critical Care, Hospital Pro Cardíaco, Rua Gal. Polidoro, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.
Fernando A BozzaInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rua Diniz Cordeiro, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the original observations by Bizzozero and Osler, we have seen tremendous advances in the understanding of platelets far beyond haemostasis and the restoration of injured endothelium. In this mini-review on platelets, we will briefly outline their historical description and the importance of their evolution, focusing on a 450 million years old living fossil of Limulus polyphemus, a marine chelicerate arthropod, which helped researchers explain the basis for the immunity role of platelets and make correlations with platelet ultrastructure and function. In addition, the impact of the Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) test for modern medicine is highlighted. The role of platelets in cardiovascular diseases, their relevance in arterial and venous thrombosis, and the utilization of antithrombotic drugs as therapeutic agents are also reported. Furthermore, platelet receptors are crucial in aggravating or mitigating other diseases, such as cancer and infections, which can recruit cells and have numerous interactions in a process recently coined "NETosis formation", which is also briefly depicted.

Indexed as

antithrombotic drugscancerglycoprotein (GP) Ib/IX/V complexLimulusLimulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL) testNETosisPlateletprotease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1)purinoceptorthrombosis

Identifiers

PMID29264366
PMCPMC5721222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.