ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2017
Airway microbiome research: a modern perspective on surveillance cultures?
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconsidering ventilator-associated pneumonia from a new dimension of the lung microbiome.EBioMedicine · 2020Review
- Changes in lung microbiome do not explain the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia.Intensive care medicine · 2019Article
- Ventilator-associated events versus ventilator-associated respiratory infections-moving into a new paradigm or merging both concepts, instead?Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is estimated to be around 10% in a high-risk population. Over the last decade, major improvements have been made in the prevention of VAP, with great cost-effectiveness. However, we still do not understand the exact pathogenesis of VAP. A better understanding might explain why some patients develop ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis, while others develop VAP even though they are infected with the same types of pathogens. Microbiome research has been a hot topic in translational medicine over the past decade. Slowly, microbiome research has also been introduced to the intensive care setting. One of the areas where it may influence our pathophysiological considerations is in VAP. The adapted island has been proposed for the colonization and infection of the respiratory tract. In this model, not only the immigration of bacteria into the lung is important, but elimination and regional growth factors are of equal significance. The importance of these factors can be supported by epidemiological studies. Several small observational studies on the development of the pulmonary microbiome during mechanical ventilation also support this theory. We speculate on the consequences of the newest insights in microbiome research on the prevention and targeted treatment of VAP. We conclude that there is still a strong need for more in-depth analyses of the changes in the microbial composition of the pulmonary microbiome during mechanical ventilation and with the development of VAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.